Ruhama Amouyal
My feedback
11 results found
-
58 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
204 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
We are investigating how we can develop/support this functionality, thanks!
Ruhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
167 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
77 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
83 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Ruhama Amouyal
commented
Hi Noam,
It's a great idea and I support it, but I think once the user clicks on "Approve and Order" he should be directed to the 'PO Line Owner and Type' screen, so he can first choose the PO Line type and then choose a template from 'Load from template' dropdown list. Basically, the order structure consists on the POL type chosen from the 'PO Line Owner and Type' screen (whether it's electronic/physical book or other material type), therefore he should have the ability to choose the POL type before choosing a template.In addition, it's important to note that the current workflow is problematic and extremely long. Once you click on "Approve and Order" action, you have to go through the following flow:
1. Get a push notification that a PO Line was created (see attached 'POL push notification')
2. When you click on the linkable PO Line, the order is in view only and you don't have the "Edit" button to edit it (see attached 'POL in view')
3. Then you have to search the PO Line
4. Click on "Go to Task List" action, as the order is in 'in review' status
5. Click on "Edit"Eventually as you indicated this flow doesn't load a specific template, so the fields are not populated with data and it definitely adds more work to be handled with the order till it finally sent to the vendor.
-
94 votesRuhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
Hi. 1. Are you stating that you want a new “Resource Type”?
2. The definitions of the resource types are explained in the table titled “Rules Used to Create the Resource Type Field – MARC 21/KORMARC and UNIMARC” at https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/010Getting_Started/050Alma_User_Interface_%E2%80%93_General_Information/Searching_in_Alma#The_Resource_Type_Field
3. Do you want a new row in this table which would be as follows?
Archival materials. LDR pos. 8 = a
4. The table is read top to bottom and as soon as match is found it stops. Where in the table would you like this new row to appear?
5. How come the title of this suggestion states “LDR pos. 8 = a” but the comment from Feb. 2 also has “LDR pos. 6 = p”? We do not think “LDR pos. 6 = p” is a good idea. That is used for “mixed materials”. On the other hand “LDR pos. 8…Ruhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
-
223 votes
Dear community,
Thanks for this idea.
I would like to make sure that we fully understand the use case:
1 The need is to allow users to change the currency for PO lines which were packaged and sent.
Can you please specify the statuses in which this is needed?
2 Upon such change, funding should be handled: disencumbrance for the original encumbered amount, and a new encumbrance on the fund with the new amount and currency. Is this correct?
3 The POL should be removed from the original PO, and re-packed. Is this correct?
4 Should the order be sent to the vendor again?
Thanks,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product
Ruhama Amouyal
supported this idea
·
I completely agree with you. Currently, you cannot select number of POLs with different currencies to create a new PO. This situation is very frustrating and the only temporary solution to overcome this is to select those with currency 1 and click on 'create new PO' and do the same flow for those with currency 2, i.e. each POLs group with different currency will be sent separately.
In general, Alma should not limit the user in this case and has to enable him to create PO with different currencies, so he will be able to send them all at once.