RapidILL Toolkit for Improving Scan Quality
π Functionality Description:
a) Description:
π οΈ Develop a comprehensive guide and set of tools to help both lending and borrowing libraries edit and improve scans produced for RapidILL.
b) Business Reason:
This enhancement would benefit the RapidILL community by:
π― Improving overall scan quality and accessibility
π€ Enhancing customer care for end-users
βοΈ Balancing speed with quality in document delivery
π§ Providing resources for libraries with varying equipment capabilities
c) User Story:
π©βπΌ As a library worker using RapidILL, I want access to best practices, tools, and guidelines for producing and editing high-quality scans, so that I can provide better service to end-users while maintaining efficiency.
d) Technical Requirements:
π Creation of a "Scan Quality Toolkit" hosted on RapidILL webpages
π₯οΈ Development or curation of online editing tools
π Integration of quality feedback option in cover sheets
π οΈ Detailed Functionality:
a) Best Practice Guidelines:
π Develop comprehensive scanning best practices
π¨οΈ Provide recommendations for hardware and software
π Include guidelines for optimal scanner settings (DPI, color vs. B&W)
b) Toolkit Components:
π Scanning Guidelines:
π Single page vs. double spread recommendations
π Page orientation guidance
βοΈ Tips for removing white/blank space
π Ensuring readability for accessibility
π Including necessary bibliographic information
π±οΈ Online Editing Tools:
π Page reordering
β Page addition
π Page rotation
βοΈ Page cropping
π Page deskewing
βοΈ Page splitting
π€ Text recognition
π File size reduction
c) Cover Sheet Enhancement:
π¬ Add optional note for unmediated workflows to gather feedback on scan quality
π Implementation Steps:
ποΈ Create the Scan Quality Toolkit web pages
π Develop best practice guidelines and recommendations
π Research and curate or develop online editing tools
π Integrate toolkit access into RapidILL interface
π Update cover sheet templates to include quality feedback option
π« Provide training and documentation for libraries on using the new toolkit
π Benefits:
π Improved overall scan quality across the RapidILL network
βΏ Enhanced accessibility for end-users
π Education and resources for libraries to improve their scanning processes
π§ Tools to address common scan quality issues
π Potential for gathering user feedback on scan quality
π Flexibility for both lending and borrowing libraries to improve scans
Closing since this has been discussed with the working group as better managed from the community perspective. The product team would welcome specific developments to review with the goal to help support this topic if there are community ideas. Thanks! -Mike