6 results found

1. It is more difficult than it seems

   It is more difficult than it seems. The game has some challenging words, with unique vowels and letters that repeat themselves, so it is not a given that you will be able to solve both problems at the dordle same time. However, I was fortunate enough to be successful on my first efforts. In contrast to Wordle, Dordle has a feature called "Free Dordle" that allows you to continue playing with fresh puzzles. This feature also acts as practice runs, so approach with care.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Snow Rider 3D code!

   Popular snowboarding game Snow Rider 3D lets you oversee a rider as they negotiate icy slopes, doing stunts and avoiding hazards. Here are the broad gameplay snow rider 3d guidelines for Snow Rider 3D, regardless of the platform you're using (mobile, web, etc.; the particular directions may differ somewhat).

   Basic Controls: Mobile Swipe / Arrow Keys

   To guide the snowboarder on mobile, use tilt/swipe or the left and right arrow buttons.
   Swipe Up or Up Arrow: Quicken.
   Down Arrow or Swipe Down: Decelerate.
   Spacebar / Tap (Android):

   Either touch the screen (on mobile) or use the spacebar (on PC) to leap and execute stunts mid-air.
   To do various acrobatics, try varying combinations of left and right arrows or swipe directions while in the air.
   Objectives:
   There may be dangers such trees, rocks, or other objects as you down the hill. Staying alive requires avoiding them.

   Popular snowboarding game Snow Rider 3D lets you oversee a rider as they negotiate icy slopes, doing stunts and avoiding hazards. Here are the broad gameplay snow rider 3d guidelines for Snow Rider 3D, regardless of the platform you're using (mobile, web, etc.; the particular directions may differ somewhat).

   Basic Controls: Mobile Swipe / Arrow Keys

   To guide the snowboarder on mobile, use tilt/swipe or the left and right arrow buttons.
   Swipe Up or Up Arrow: Quicken.
   Down Arrow or Swipe Down: Decelerate.
   Spacebar / Tap (Android):

   Either touch the screen (on mobile) or use the spacebar (on PC) to… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Material flow simplification by making things optional

   Currently the material flow combines amongst others, a restrictive list of access rights, retention policies and metadata fields. These operate as restrictions on which access rights, retention policies and metadata fields can be supplied by the submitter. We suggest to make it possible to opt-out on any of these restrictions. That would benefit customers that have automated submission workflows outside of Rosetta where the metadata is already checked for validity and fully under control. It would also help solving human errors when new ARs are created, but forgotten to be added to their respective material flows. If it not possible to opt-out, it would be nice to have 'I do not care' or 'Anything' entries in the access right and retention policy list that do basically the same. For us personally, relaxing the access right restrictions would be the biggest win.

   Currently the material flow combines amongst others, a restrictive list of access rights, retention policies and metadata fields. These operate as restrictions on which access rights, retention policies and metadata fields can be supplied by the submitter. We suggest to make it possible to opt-out on any of these restrictions. That would benefit customers that have automated submission workflows outside of Rosetta where the metadata is already checked for validity and fully under control. It would also help solving human errors when new ARs are created, but forgotten to be added to their respective material flows. If it not possible… more

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. OAI Harvester Job - Configurable Time Out

   As of now (Version 6) it is not possible to configure the time out of the OAI harvesting process.
   When trying to harvest from a server that takes 1 min to answer (with resumption token at a given number) the harvester job fails.

   We would like to be able to set the time out ourselves. Ideally this becomes a setting within the harvester job dialogue.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. change to Rosetta METS XSD re: duplicate file IDs

   During a recent batch of deposits (see case 00477041 from the Getty for more info) we figured out that, due to an error in our one of our input files that creates the METS, our original METS file did not have unique file IDs in the structMaps for the preservation master and modified master representations. It was simply repeating the same file ID from the access file representation.

   For some reason, this did not cause a METS validation error when we validated against the Rosetta XSD before deposit, nor when it was deposited. However, it resulted in the METS in Rosetta not having any files listed in the structMaps that contained the duplicate files IDs. Since the fileIDs were correct in the fileSec it imported all the files properly, but they were not referenced from any structMap. Fixing this using the back office would have taken too much effort so we deleted the ca. 150 IEs and redid them from scratch.

   Might you be able to enhance the METS XSD so that it requires file IDs to be unique in each structMap? I know it is against Rosetta's data model to refer to the same file ID from different representations with the same structMap type so it would make sense if the XSD enforced this requirement.

   During a recent batch of deposits (see case 00477041 from the Getty for more info) we figured out that, due to an error in our one of our input files that creates the METS, our original METS file did not have unique file IDs in the structMaps for the preservation master and modified master representations. It was simply repeating the same file ID from the access file representation.

   For some reason, this did not cause a METS validation error when we validated against the Rosetta XSD before deposit, nor when it was deposited. However, it resulted in the METS in… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Additional rule input parameter: material flow

   Since the organization levels in Rosetta are limited to consortium and institution, we often have to ingest objects of different origin an type into a single institution. This poses problems as for certain sources you want to activate more or less extraction and/or file extension rules that for other sources. Currently we have to leave the more permissive rules off, make the SIPs fail and end up in the TA, enable the permissive rules, rerun the SIPs and finally disable the permissive rules.

   This is a pain and requires many manual interventions that are error-prone and can influence other ingests that happen at the same time.

   Rules can be selected based on Producer name, but it is far more work to set up and maintain a number of Producers that it is to create multiple material flows. We therefore would like to suggest to add an extra selection parameter for selecting a number of material flows.

   Since the organization levels in Rosetta are limited to consortium and institution, we often have to ingest objects of different origin an type into a single institution. This poses problems as for certain sources you want to activate more or less extraction and/or file extension rules that for other sources. Currently we have to leave the more permissive rules off, make the SIPs fail and end up in the TA, enable the permissive rules, rerun the SIPs and finally disable the permissive rules.

   This is a pain and requires many manual interventions that are error-prone and can influence other ingests… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Deposit  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close