My feedback

22 results found

1. A-Z option in Primo VE Journal Search

   184 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   11 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  ·  December 20, 2019

2. Need ability to search 79X fields

   58 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Alma » Resource Management - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   An error occurred while saving the comment
   Ted Schwitzner commented  ·  July 22, 2019  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…

   We would like to see the 79X tags added to the list of available local tags in the metadata editor. Our consortium's member libraries have been practiced in using these fields for local metadata, and we would like to not lose that data. Additionally, OCLC Bibliographic Formats & Standards have established these fields for use by its member libraries, including in OCLC's Local Bibliographic Data (LBD).

   Save Submitting...
   Ted Schwitzner supported this idea  ·  July 22, 2019