AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris)

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi,
    As previously discussed, v6.1 includes the option to define any descriptive MD field to populate the share URL, or disable the link altogether. In case of a URL which needs to be generated on the fly, you can use the existing ie.xsl to add the link/s to the MD pane.
    Please let me know if you would like to keep this idea open, or whether the updated functionality is sufficient.
    Thank you!
    Daniel

  2. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Ryan,
    Release 6.1 introduced the video.js player as a replacement to JWPlayer. The player adjusts itself to the frame. Could you please confirm and update the idea accordingly?
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  3. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Thank you for this idea. Are you interested in BIB-to-BIB relationship, which means the related title will display all representations of the host BIB, or / and a BIB-to-representation relationship, which will display only specific representations in the view-it of the related BIB?

  4. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Thank you for your suggestion. Assuming majority of the end-users will reach the viewer through Primo (which opens a tab for the viewer) could you please describe the desired behaviour from your pov once the user selects the link to Primo from the viewer? Open an additional Primo tab? Thank you, Daniel

  5. 52 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    The rule of thumb is that a set of a specific entity can be created by a unique identifier of that entity only, and the same should apply here - we wouldn't like to create a set of titles, using rep IDs. This is similar to Portfolio_id which can only create a set of portfolios or item_ids for items. I can suggest that you add "Representation Details"."IED" to the analytics report, change the column name to "PID" and then create a set.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  6. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Dave,
    Thank you for the suggestion. The British Library example is of JPGs, have you come across an example with PDF search?
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  7. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi,
    Thank you for your suggestion. Before we proceed to review the idea in detail, could you please explain whether creating a dedicated single OAI set for migration is a valid option for your institution? Is it a matter of convenience or overhead?
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  8. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Rosetta » Ingest  ·  Admin →
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Teresa et al,
    Please let me know if this issue can be closed. We have quite a strong preference not to provide an additional, "easy" method to categorically ignore all errors, so please let me know if the workaround is sufficient.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  9. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Peta,
    Thank you for the idea. Could you possibly change the category to "Resource Management - Digital" so it would be prioritized in that context? In addition, in case we decide to expand the licences functionality to digital content, as suggested here - https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/36032197-support-best-practice-for-cc-licence-for-digital-t, would you still need to display fields 540 and 542?
    Daniel

  10. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Dear Lijana,
    Thank you for your idea. The DI working group has been working with us on download management and I strongly suggest that this idea will be discussed in the context of the WG, perhaps as a next stage of the download control which will be introduced in 6.1
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  11. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Stefan. Thank you for your suggestion. Could you please elaborate on the use-case? Alma currently publishes the rep delivery URL, how would you like to combine the file/s URL?

  12. 37 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Jörg. Thank you for your detailed and useful feedback, we are examining the various requests you raised regarding the AIP update process. As your request relates to many aspects of the process, requiring non-trivial effort to tackle the majority of them, I would like to suggest the following:
    1. We understand one of the central pain-points is the version increment handling, whereby each file / MD update creates a new IE version. We could design and implement a solution where certain APIs could be run without commit and add a new commit/rollback API. This will grant the institution control over the version increments.
    2. We would very much like to address as many issues as possible, but as our resources are limited we cannot cover such a vast set of enhancements in addition to other major work-group features in the pipeline. Therefore for the remaining issues, I would like to suggest creating a list of defined requirements, perhaps via the working groups, and raising a vote for each. I believe this will allow us to focus better on a development plan.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

Feedback and Knowledge Base