AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris)

My feedback

  1. 121 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    At the first stage, we will be releasing this functionality for standard Primo users and will update once it is scheduled for Primo VE too. Thank you, Daniel

    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Thank you for your feedback. I will include this in an upcoming release.
    Daniel

    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi,
    Would it be sufficient for your use case if we expose the Policy ID as part of the AVD published to Primo?
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  2. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Dave,
    Thank you for the suggestion. The British Library example is of JPGs, have you come across an example with PDF search?
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  3. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi,
    Thank you for your suggestion. Before we proceed to review the idea in detail, could you please explain whether creating a dedicated single OAI set for migration is a valid option for your institution? Is it a matter of convenience or overhead?
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  4. 20 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Rosetta » Ingest  ·  Admin →

    Hi Teresa et al,
    Please let me know if this issue can be closed. We have quite a strong preference not to provide an additional, "easy" method to categorically ignore all errors, so please let me know if the workaround is sufficient.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  5. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi Peta,
    Thank you for the idea. Could you possibly change the category to "Resource Management - Digital" so it would be prioritized in that context? In addition, in case we decide to expand the licences functionality to digital content, as suggested here - https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/36032197-support-best-practice-for-cc-licence-for-digital-t, would you still need to display fields 540 and 542?
    Daniel

  6. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Dear Lijana,
    Thank you for your idea. The DI working group has been working with us on download management and I strongly suggest that this idea will be discussed in the context of the WG, perhaps as a next stage of the download control which will be introduced in 6.1
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  7. 18 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hi Stefan. Thank you for your suggestion. Could you please elaborate on the use-case? Alma currently publishes the rep delivery URL, how would you like to combine the file/s URL?

  8. 5 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Franziska,
    As of 5.4, the IE and REP viewers support a configurable "download all" function. Please let me know if and which gaps exist beyond this functionality.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

  9. 36 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    AdminDaniel Greenberg (Product Manager, Ex Libris) commented  · 

    Hi Jörg. Thank you for your detailed and useful feedback, we are examining the various requests you raised regarding the AIP update process. As your request relates to many aspects of the process, requiring non-trivial effort to tackle the majority of them, I would like to suggest the following:
    1. We understand one of the central pain-points is the version increment handling, whereby each file / MD update creates a new IE version. We could design and implement a solution where certain APIs could be run without commit and add a new commit/rollback API. This will grant the institution control over the version increments.
    2. We would very much like to address as many issues as possible, but as our resources are limited we cannot cover such a vast set of enhancements in addition to other major work-group features in the pipeline. Therefore for the remaining issues, I would like to suggest creating a list of defined requirements, perhaps via the working groups, and raising a vote for each. I believe this will allow us to focus better on a development plan.
    Thank you,
    Daniel

Feedback and Knowledge Base