Diana
My feedback
32 results found
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
234 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
This idea has been closed by mistake, I apologize for the inconvenience.
It will be reviewed and addressed according to the regular workflow of content requests.
My sincere apologies.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
Diana
supported this idea
·
Hi Moshe,
We tested using the ignore_lender_due_date parameter but this won't work for us. The main issue we noticed that with the parameter turned on was that the maximum renewal date was ignored and there was no notification to the lender. Ignoring the lender due date would also require borrowing libraries to create separate Loan Rules for partners with differing TOU and additional communication with partners. Ideally, the lender’s TOU would be applied.