Barbara Grob
My feedback
4 results found
-
258 votes
Hello everyone, for those who raised comments about the correction of 830 $v, could you please provide a detailed, step-by-step explanation of the scenario in which this subfield gets overwritten?
An error occurred while saving the comment Barbara Grob supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Barbara Grob commented
Another example for such a requirement is $v in field 830_0. The volume number is specific for each BIB record and it would avoid correction time or even errors if the subfield was not overwritten by copying field 830 with F3.
-
148 votes
I wonder if this request takes into account that certain fields in the 1XX/6XX/7XX have different first indicator definitions in the MARC21 standard for Bibliographic fields compared to their corresponding Authority fields. In such cases, copying the first indicator from the Authority to the Bibliographic heading would result in incorrect data. Is the reqeust is about Names only? Hans, I would recommend consulting with AAFG group for a details spec where this requested behavior is valid to which fields.
Barbara Grob supported this idea ·
-
118 votes
Barbara Grob supported this idea ·
-
116 votes
Barbara Grob supported this idea ·
We would be happy, if especially in field 830 the subfield $v would not be overwritten. That causes correction time and even errors the way it is actually.