Skip to content

Fredrik S. Pettersen

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

5 results found

  1. proximity search operator for fulltext search in Primo Central

    174 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Primo » User Functionality  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Fredrik S. Pettersen supported this idea  · 

  2. Wrong holdings information for FRBR-grouped books outside of IZ

    258 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Integration with other systems  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Fredrik S. Pettersen commented  · 

    This is still an issue for us, nearly two years after it was originally launched as an idea. I hope Ex Libris will change their mind regarding this functionality, as it is still causing confusion amongst our members.

    Fredrik S. Pettersen supported this idea  · 

  3. Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation

    658 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    21 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Fredrik S. Pettersen supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Fredrik S. Pettersen commented  · 

    We strongly support a more nuanced treatment of records with a 773 field and the effect it has on related records.

    In addition to what you write in the idea, we've struggled with the fact that the system doesn't take the second indicator into account either. A 773 second indicator can either be # or 8. # represents "In", which indicates that the record is a part of the Host Item, while an 8 does not. When this is not taken into account, it causes trouble with holdings information. Our suggestion would be that a change to this behavior is considered within the scope of this idea as well.

  4. Make consistent the use of CDI record data in Primo UI

    315 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Fredrik S. Pettersen supported this idea  · 

  5. Use the “Course Reserves Automatic Statuses” regardless of rollover type when recalculating citation status

    28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Leganto  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Fredrik S. Pettersen shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)