Stacie Traill
My feedback
11 results found
-
405 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
206 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
212 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
303 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
54 votes
Hello everyone,
I’d like to share our plans to introduce support for XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) normalization rules. This new feature is designed for handling complex normalization tasks. It offers the flexibility of a full programming language, enabling advanced data manipulation. This will complement our existing normalization rules based on DROOLS, maintaining all of its current capabilities.
Would the addition of this new type of normalization rule meet the requirements outlined in this idea?
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
28 votes
Hello everyone,
I’d like to share our plans to introduce support for XSL (Extensible Stylesheet Language) normalization rules. This new feature is designed for handling complex normalization tasks. It offers the flexibility of a full programming language, enabling advanced data manipulation. This will complement our existing normalization rules based on DROOLS, maintaining all of its current capabilities.
Would the addition of this new type of normalization rule meet the requirements outlined in this idea?
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Stacie Traill supported this idea ·
We would like this option, as well. We frequently pull batches of records out of Alma for external enhancement, and it's necessary to create an itemized set of all records in the original set that were suppressed before overlaying with the enhanced versions, so that the right records can be re-suppressed after the import job runs. This is a lot of extra steps we'd like to avoid.