Skip to content

Luigi Siciliano

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

44 results found

  1. Primo Central Index ( PCI ) - more granularity in excluding content from activated resources - e.g. exclude from index by resource type

    103 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    @François,
    the solution you propose is quite powerful. Perhaps a bit complex to implement and manage, but of course powerful.
    Simply allowing to include/exclude in the index by resource type (e.g. exclude Book reviews and Reference and include articles) would be an important step ahead that perhaps is more doable in the short term.
    However the two ideas go in the same direction and make clear to ExL how some sort of improvement must be figured out.

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  2. Allow to delete records in Primo BE ( included dedup records )

    44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Luigi Siciliano supported this idea  · 
    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  3. Show the terms added to the patron's query by the linguistic features (i.e. stemming, synonyms etc.)

    57 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Two closely related ideas are:

    new option/checkbox: "expand my results with synonyms"
    http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18441406-new-option-checkbox-expand-my-results-with-synon

    Send the same enriched query (stemming, synonyms, etc) to both local index and Primo Central PC index ( important for blended search ) http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/18551905-send-the-same-enriched-query-stemming-synonyms

    There is also a thread in the Primo ML having as subject:
    [Primo] query enrichment is applied by default and is a bit a black box - need for improvements to linguistic features

    Luigi Siciliano shared this idea  · 

  4. Copy parts of Normalization Rules Sets to other fields in the same set

    38 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » Administrative Tools  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Luigi Siciliano commented  · 

    Dear Lukas thank you for proposing this old NERS request as idea. Both approaches, copy NR subset (statically) or include NR subset (dynamically) are useful. We preferred in our original NERS proposal the latter approach because it allows to use subset of NR as routines in a procedural language, and in case of update of the NR subset, any change would have been applied automatically to/inherited by all NR using that included subset.
    On the other hand statically copying pieces of rules - as you propose in this idea - allows to use them as templates and it's perhaps easier to implement. Which might also be a factor.
    Under the circumstances, any of the two solutions would be welcomed.

1 3 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)