Skip to content

Avivit Stamker-Avisar

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 63 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hi. 1. Are you stating that you want a new “Resource Type”?
    2. The definitions of the resource types are explained in the table titled “Rules Used to Create the Resource Type Field – MARC 21/KORMARC and UNIMARC” at https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/010Getting_Started/050Alma_User_Interface_%E2%80%93_General_Information/Searching_in_Alma#The_Resource_Type_Field
    3. Do you want a new row in this table which would be as follows?
    Archival materials. LDR pos. 8 = a
    4. The table is read top to bottom and as soon as match is found it stops. Where in the table would you like this new row to appear?
    5. How come the title of this suggestion states “LDR pos. 8 = a” but the comment from Feb. 2 also has “LDR pos. 6 = p”? We do not think “LDR pos. 6 = p” is a good idea. That is used for “mixed materials”. On the other hand “LDR pos. 8…

    Avivit Stamker-Avisar supported this idea  · 
  2. 30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Avivit Stamker-Avisar commented  · 

    Yes. We have asked through SalesForce and the answer was:
    "The Alma Viewer takes the format information from the record's operational record.
    The double separators appear because both the MD Editor and the operational record creation process generate separators between the subfields of field 300.
    Making changes to either of these places would require a major redesign, and thus cannot be handled as a bug. However, Product Management is aware of this issue and will look to include it on the roadmap for the near future, if possible.
    In the meanwhile, we suggest you raise this as an idea in our ideas exchange platform..."

    Avivit Stamker-Avisar supported this idea  · 
  3. 38 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Avivit Stamker-Avisar supported this idea  · 
  4. 128 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Avivit Stamker-Avisar supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base