Skip to content

Kirsten H

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

1 result found

  1. Notes in POL's should only be for notes (not history)

    163 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    11 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisition - PO & POLine  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Under Review  ·  AdminZohar Shemesh (zohar.shemesh@exlibrisgroup.com, Ex Libris) responded

    Dear all,

    Thank you for sharing this idea.

    I have read it carefully, and would like to make sure that I understand it:

    Current situation:

    There are several processes in PO line workflow which add automatic internal notes, for example:

    - Renewal ("PO Line has been renewed automatically on…")

    - Moving PO line out of PO (""Line was removed from Order ...")

    - other.

    Desired outcome:

    Have a configurable option to disable these notes from being created. Each of these processes is/will be saved in the PO line history.

    Please let me know if this understanding is correct.

    Thanks,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alma product team

    Kirsten H supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kirsten H commented  · 

    Glad to find that this has already been raised and completely agree with everything that has been said. The POL Notes should be user-entered notes only. "The PO Line was renewed automatically on..." and "Line was removed from Order ..." belong in the history. I don't see any functional purpose to have them clutter up the notes and displace relevant POL Notes we need to reference. Deleting them manually in each POL is a nuisance. Please make this at least an option in the configuration to turn off!

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)