Milo Bernasconi
My feedback
10 results found
-
143 votes
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
125 votes
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
77 votes
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
87 votes
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Milo Bernasconi
shared this idea
·
-
24 votes
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
220 votes
Dear colleagues,
Thanks you for suggesting this idea.
After reading it carefully, my understanding is that the need is for a new “entity” which will serve as a “bridge” between encumbrance and expenditure. This bridge will be named “Pending invoices”.
Any POL which is invoiced will be disencumbered and the amount will be added to the “pending invoices balance”. When an invoice is approved, the amount should be reduced from the “pending invoices balance” and added as an expenditure.
- Is this understanding correct?
- Do you think that the definition of using this "bridge" should be in institution level, or might be different from invoice to invoice?
Please note that this is a complicated addition. We will need to define the behavior in rollover, and in any place that changes balances etc.
Thanks for your collaboration,
Tamar Fuches
Alma product team
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
AdminTamar Ganor
(Admin, Ex Libris)
responded
Hello,
We currently don't receive any metadata from Medialex.
Their content is available in CDI through DOAJ, and as this is a new provider, it will need to go through the CERV (previously NERS) voting cycle.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·
-
154 votes
Hello,
We encountered several challenges during the analysis, and at this time we do not have a timeline for implementing a policy change.
I have updated the status to "Under Review" as we continue evaluating the best approach for adjusting the overwrite process.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Best regards,
Tamar
Milo Bernasconi
supported this idea
·