Daniel Sandbecker
My feedback
3 results found
-
108 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Daniel Sandbecker supported this idea · -
27 votesDaniel Sandbecker shared this idea ·
-
28 votesDaniel Sandbecker shared this idea ·
Some fields are not just marked as not supported, but intentionally misused.
There is a specific idea registered for supporting "unavailable holds count" and "unavailable hold items fields": https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/44459898-alma-to-support-sip2-response
Alma does not support this field, but furthermore also specifies in the documentation for the supported "holdItemsCount" that unavailable hold requests are counted there instead. The items summary also includes data for the unsupported "unavailableHoldsItems" field in the "holdItems" field. This causes real issues when self check machines that actually supports the standard trusts the Alma SIP2 implementation.