Skip to content

Daniel Sandbecker

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 108 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Daniel Sandbecker commented  · 

    Some fields are not just marked as not supported, but intentionally misused.

    There is a specific idea registered for supporting "unavailable holds count" and "unavailable hold items fields": https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/44459898-alma-to-support-sip2-response

    Alma does not support this field, but furthermore also specifies in the documentation for the supported "holdItemsCount" that unavailable hold requests are counted there instead. The items summary also includes data for the unsupported "unavailableHoldsItems" field in the "holdItems" field. This causes real issues when self check machines that actually supports the standard trusts the Alma SIP2 implementation.

    Daniel Sandbecker supported this idea  · 
  2. 27 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Daniel Sandbecker shared this idea  · 
  3. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Daniel Sandbecker shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base