Skip to content

Johanna Lucignoli

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 131 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Johanna Lucignoli supported this idea  · 
  2. 82 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Johanna Lucignoli supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Johanna Lucignoli commented  · 

    I would also find it helpful if the invoices could also be processed / delete or set back to review directly in POL. So far it is only possible via vendors or directly via calling up the invoice number.

  3. 42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Johanna Lucignoli supported this idea  · 
  4. 123 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear Community,


    This is to update you that we plan to develop this requirement in a future Alma release.


    We plan to add two fields to the Transactions table display:

    PO Line description

    Creator


    They will be hidden by default, enabling them will be done via the table's customization.


    Please follow up on Alma Release Notes for updates on this development.


    Best wishes,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alma Product Team

    Johanna Lucignoli supported this idea  · 
  5. 255 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear all,


    As we are analyzing the requirements for this idea, I'd like to clarify with you what should the identification of "Next Year" be?

    • Is it the next calendar year (so if selected in any date in 2024 it will return the entire 2025, meaning 1.1.2025-31.12.2025)?
    • Is it the next 365 days? Including today or not including today?
    • Is it the next 12 months? Including current month or not including current month?
    • Other?


    Many thanks,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alna Product Team

    Johanna Lucignoli supported this idea  · 
  6. 494 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Accepted  ·  Dana Moshkovits responded

    When creating a a POL, it will be possible to also define a default item policy and temporary location. This will be used when items are created (by a prediction pattern or manually) on POL or at receive time

    Johanna Lucignoli supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base