Skip to content

Rialto

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Rialto by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.


  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

5 results found

  1. Create a Role so that Selectors can make changes to a Selection Plan criteria

    Right now selection plans can only be created, edited, or tested by Administrators. It would be helpful to have a role where selectors could make these changes. Perhaps as a "save as draft" function where the Administrator could still be the one who has to activate the changes.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hello,

    This idea is being closed as part of our annual clean-up process (criteria for closure: older than 12 months, fewer than 10 votes). If you would like to reopen this idea, please contact Amy Copeland (amy.copeland@clarivate.com) and she can reopen your idea for future consideration. We appreciate your feedback and encourage you to continue to participate in the Ideas Exchange process.

    Best,

    Rialto Product Management

  2. Ability to Set Parameters in Purchase Request Forms

    We have a preferred set of publishers, platforms, and/or vendors that buy eBooks from. Currently, there is no way to set up Purchase Request Forms for our users to request ONLY from those preferred sellers.

    It would be great if there was a way to define our preferred publishers (and even other facets) in the Purchase Request Form configuration, so we don't have to deny a ton of incoming requests.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This idea is being closed as part of our annual clean-up process (criteria for closure: older than 12 month, fewer than 10 votes). If you would like to reopen this idea, please contact Amy Copeland (amy.copeland@clarivate.com) and she can reopen your idea for future consideration. We appreciate your feedback and encourage you to continue to participate in the Ideas Exchange process.

    Best,

    Rialto Product Management

  3. Automatically remove titles that no long meet DDA Selection Plan criteria from Rialto DDA pool, Ebook Central/LibCentral and Alma repository

    When a DDA title increases in cost so it exceeds the maximum cost we set for our DDA, it becomes untriggerable and inaccessible on the Ebook Central platform, but the title remains in our DDA pool in Rialto and our Alma holdings, so users can find the title in Primo but cannot access it. Removing these titles requires a cumbersome manual workflow. This enhancement would make it so titles that no longer meet our DDA selection plan criteria are removed from our DDA pool automatically in Rialto, Ebook Central/LibCentral, and in the Alma repository.This would ensure users don't discover inaccessible…

    17 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    The Rialto team has reviewed this idea but at this time it does not align with our roadmap initiatives. We appreciate your feedback and encourage you to continue to participate in the Ideas Exchange process.

    Best,

    Amy Copeland

    Senior Product Manager

  4. Duplicate a Selection Plan

    We'd like to be able to duplicate existing selection plans. See the image for more information. We're finding it helpful to duplicate them for experimentation. Thanks!

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    Hello, 

    This idea is being closed as part of our annual clean-up process (criteria for closure: older than 12 month, fewer than 10 votes). If you would like to reopen this idea, please contact Heidi Whitehead (Heidi.whitehead@clarivate.com) and she can reopen your idea for future consideration. We appreciate your feedback and encourage you to continue to participate in the Ideas Exchange process. 

    Best, 

    Heidi Whitehead

    Rialto Product Manager

  5. keep history of rejected titles from selection plans

    It would be helpful to have a history of what titles have been rejected from selection plans. This data can help us understand when certain titles did not come on selection and give us a dataset to analyze to improve the selection plan for the goal of making it more automated.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)

    This idea is being closed as part of our annual clean-up process (criteria for closure: older than 12 month, fewer than 10 votes). If you would like to reopen this idea, please contact Heidi Whitehead (Heidi.whitehead@clarivate.com) and she can reopen your idea for future consideration. We appreciate your feedback and encourage you to continue to participate in the Ideas Exchange process. 

    Best, 

    Heidi Whitehead

    Rialto Product Manager

  • Don't see your idea?