Skip to content

Matt T

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt T commented  · 

    I think this would be great here too. Our SIS overwrites any changes staff make to patron borrowing records at next sync and we want it as a reminder that changes must be processed through our SIS interface, not through Alma - and read only fields would be great to enforce that

    Furthermore, many libraries operate with student staff members after hours (we do, I believe Curtin does too). It may not be desirable to give these staff members write access to these fields - but only read them for identity verification. Alma is used as part of our 100 point ID check for patrons calling by phone.

  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt T shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base