Matt T

My feedback

  1. 191 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt T commented  · 

    I think this would be great here too. Our SIS overwrites any changes staff make to patron borrowing records at next sync and we want it as a reminder that changes must be processed through our SIS interface, not through Alma - and read only fields would be great to enforce that

    Furthermore, many libraries operate with student staff members after hours (we do, I believe Curtin does too). It may not be desirable to give these staff members write access to these fields - but only read them for identity verification. Alma is used as part of our 100 point ID check for patrons calling by phone.

  3. 194 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Matt T supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    Matt T shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base