Skip to content

Esploro

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Esploro by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.

We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.

For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.


How can we improve Esploro?

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

4 results found

  1. Smart Harvest / Smart Expansion - Approval history required

    We've noticed that once a Smart Harvest or Smart Expansion asset is approved, there is no record of which user account approved the asset.

    For training and quality control purposes, we would like to know who has approved these assets. Please consider adding this function to assets that have been sourced via Smart Harvest and Smart Expansion.

    We submitted this as a bug, but have been advised it is an enhancement request.

    28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Completed  ·  AdminTami Ezra (Admin, Ex Libris) responded

    The status date and operator who approved has been added to the Smart harvesting subject area.  These fields also display in the author matching task list.

  2. Add ability to change asset type from author matching review screen OR in editing provisional asset details screen

    When approving Smart Harvest matches in the client, sometimes it is easy to tell that an asset is not a journal article, etc. For example if the title has the word Comment or Abstract as part of the title.

    Right now you must approve the match and exit author matching to update asset type. This is not efficient, and I often forget to update these.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Add WOS id as part of Smart Harvest / Smart Expansion

    Now that we can display WOS citation counts, we need to find a way to update all our records with the WOS id. For this we are planning to export, match via DOI, and reimport. Moving forward it would be ideal if the WOS id is added to the asset at the time of Smart Harvesting / expansion.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Add ability to send list of unapproved Smart Harvest matches to confirm

    Sometimes it is impossible to confirm Smart Harvest results unless you have a current CV or publication list.

    We would like to be able to send lists of unapproved Smart Harvest results to individual researchers to confirm or reject.

    Initially, we would like to just send an email to researchers. Eventually, we would like them to be able to mark confirm/reject and reply and the Smart Harvest list would update.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Smart Harvesting  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?

Esploro

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)