Skip to content

Content

We welcome your ideas for new content (metadata) to add to the Knowledge Bases (KBs - Alma CZ, SFX, 360) and Discovery services (CDI - Central Discovery Index whose data supports Primo and Summon).


How to increase your idea's visibility and get more votes:
  1. Check if your idea has already been posted and vote for it before posting a new idea.
  2. Choose the right category: "New Provider" for content from a provider that has no available content in the KBs or CDI, or "Existing Provider" for content from a provider that already has content available in the KBs or CDI.
  3. Add a direct link to the provider/resource you suggest, and a contact person if possible.
  4. For enrichment requests add the relevant collection ID(s). 
  5. Make sure you mention any specific added value your idea has to the community such as language or supporting diversity.
  6. Did you find errors in an existing collection? please open a case.
  7. A new year has begun but no corresponding annual collection? post an idea in Idea Exchange, make sure to mention if it is an existing provider.


The categories for new content ideas are:
  1. Existing Provider - if your idea is for a new collection from a provider that already has content available in the KBs and CDI or enriching records for an existing collection, use this category. No voting is necessary, ideas for existing providers will be handled regardless of voting.
  2. New Providers - if your idea is for content from a provider that does not have any content available in the KBs and CDI, choose this category.
  3. Other - for non provider specific ideas

If you want to add an institutional repository, please open a case and follow the documentation here:

7 results found

  1. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  other  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    Unfortunately, there were not enough details to follow up on this request.

    It seems more suitable for a support ticket, can you please open one?

    Or reach out to me directly for further analysis

    tamar.ganor@clarivate.com

    Kind regards,

    Tamar

  2. Add chinese classification field in the electronic reousrces bib

    Now the classification in electronic reousrces bib is Dewey or LC,It cannot satisify the need of chinese library users of ALMA,espicially when we need to provide statistics of subject.The need is frequently and urgent in chinese libraries.We hope ALMA can collabrate to other organises to impove the function,which might help add the users of ALMA.

    0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Closed  ·  1 comment  ·  other  ·  Admin →
  3. Next Expected Update date for collections

    Similar to the "Last Full Update" and "Last Partial Update" dates for collections, it could cut down on the volume of cases about new individual titles if the collections that get updated on a regular schedule also had "Next Expected Update" date to display.

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  other  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    Expected update frequency is not part of any standardized metadata from content providers.

    Furthermore, update frequency depends on the content being updated on the platform and due to the nature of the publishing industry, it cannot be committed to in advance. Even regularly updated collections may skip an update cycle because there's no new content added to the collection.

    As a result, adding expected update frequency for book collections or journal collections can be misleading as it is hypothetical and may create false expectations.

    Therefore, I am closing this idea as 'expected update' cannot be accurately added to collections to create a useful and reliable indication.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

  4. Add chapter and contents information to book records

    Chapter and contents information is extrememly useful to our users but is often missing from records. We'd like records to be enriched with this information where possible.

    21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  other  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    Some providers cannot send us granular metadata for book chapters and contents.

    If you have a specific provider in mind, please post a new idea.

    Thanks,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

  5. Audiobook as a format in the 360 knowledge base

    Right now the only formats in the 360 knowledge base are monograph, serial, and video- I would like to have audiobook available.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  other  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    I can confirm Ex Libris is not planning to add any new material types in 360, therefore I am closing this idea.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

  6. CZ AMD bib material type revised

    There are many AMD related collections (Collection ID: 61616107200003966; Collection ID: 61616086800003966 and so on) in ALMA CZ. We found many resources bib material type are defined as JOURNAL, which is wrong compared with the real situation(They may be manscript,document ,photograph in the database platform). However, we cannot upload electronic material type in batch to replace.

    We think CZ should confirm and fix the wrong bib material type.

    20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  other  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    I could not find the collection ID's you mentioned.

    If this is still an issue, please open a support ticket.

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

  7. New LexisNexis / Nexis Uni linking solution

    It feels like a very small minority of links to Nexis Uni content resolve successfully. I've opened a number of support tickets without much progress, only to be told that LexisNexis/Nexis Uni simply doesn't work well with the OpenURL resolver. I'd like more development work to go into this connection as it renders a large amount of content in a very popular database inaccessible.

    44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  other  ·  Admin →

    Hello,

    As of August 2022 the article level linking was removed from Nexis Uni as we could not support it with the currently available metadata.

    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Content/Knowledge_Articles/Alma/Knowledge_Articles/Alma%3A_LexisNexis_-_removal_of_article-level_linking_for_some_collections

    Kind regards,

    Tamar Ganor

    Content Product Manager

  • Don't see your idea?

Content

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base