Search Results - Include Menu Option (Tile) Name
When a user searches for particular terms within the CampusM front-end they are presented with a list of results.
At the moment these results do not always include the overall Tile name. This would be useful when needing to identify particular tiles requiring update around certain information.
At present the tile name is only presented if the search reference is found 'high up' the tile structure. If the reference is further down a menu path, only the latter part of the path is shown.
Claire Hammersley
shared this idea
Hey Claire,
Can you provide an example/scenario so we can better understand your experience?
-
Claire Hammersley
commented
Hi, This continues in React Native and I have attached a screenshot to illustrate.
Here I have searched for the term 'Enrolment' which has returned a number of results.
When looking at the content results from the 3rd one down, and reading the 'mini header' attached, there are some derived from tiles such as 'Enrolment' or 'Enrol Now' or 'Account Block' for example.
These are the main tile name headers shown which identify where the search result 'lives' if the user wished to revisit the tile directly without search in the future.
I also know these tiles to have minimal structure behind, likely just a page or 2.
However, some results such as those noted beneath 'My Attendance' or 'International Student Compliance' have come out of our StudentHub@Derby' or 'International' tiles respectively, which have a more complex layer of pages beneath.
So for those we are not seeing the overall tile name from where the search result was found which would be useful, we are instead seeing a layer within the tile as the heading.
-
Claire Hammersley
commented
This issue remains post React Native - Search results, depending on the layer they exist within the content tile structure, only sometimes present the Tile Name, with many still just displaying a sub menu name within, which as mentioned initially does not clarify which tile the information exists within. Please can this issue be reopened for further review?
