K.Clement

My feedback

  1. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    K.Clement commented  · 

    Searching in RCM is also very difficult, no boolean or multiple field search.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    K.Clement commented  · 

    EXAMPLE FROM RESEARCHER: "The issue has to do with the size of the field provided for the selection of references to insert – we do not always see enough information about the different references to choose the correct one for insertion. This happens when we require different versions of the same document type – for instance, if we are referencing older and newer versions of product information, the dates do not show in the field, so the references look identical (which makes sense because the title, author, etc. are the same, but only the document date or the page numbers are different). You may remember that I have identified this as an issue in each of the previous testing phases for RefWorks ProQuest. "

    If we can't do multi-field or boolean searching, then we need to see more info to choose the right item. If we can't re-size the window, then we need to be able to pull the exact item needed in a precise way.

    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  2. 15 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    K.Clement commented  · 

    Link to source URL suggestions: Pubmed, Ebsco databases (e.g. Cinahl, PsycInfo), and Ovid databases (e.g. Embase, Cochrane).

    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    K.Clement commented  · 

    Doesn't that already happen in some databases e.g. from Ebsco? OVID also has the option, although it's slightly less "perma"

  3. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement shared this idea  · 
  5. 107 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    K.Clement commented  · 

    FYI, I did create a custom version of a current style, with date sorting, and then as Admin I shared that Institutionally. In our case it was ICMJE, date descending, for use in person CVs. So you do not change the style appearance, just the ordering of the references list.

  9. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  10. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  11. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  12. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 
  13. 26 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    K.Clement supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base