Skip to content

Jeanette Isele

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 373 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeanette Isele commented  · 

    This would be perfect!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeanette Isele commented  · 

    Dear Moshe
    Thank you very much for your comment.
    Did I understand correctly that the idea would be to have then 10 fee status which are considered as closed but with different "labels"?
    This would be great!
    Kind regards
    Jeanette

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeanette Isele commented  · 

    In the context of the NERS Voting ExLibris suggested an alternative development which covers the same use case and would also be suitable:
    Allow the bursar import to supply a comment that will be recorded on the transaction. The comment will be free text, and viewable in the transactions list. It will also be reportable in Analytics. This way the bursar will be able to supply any additional information that is required for the library staff to view. Also - add the fine comment to Primo. An 'Add Comment' option will enable inserting new text to the comment but not editing existing ones. The newly added text will be automatically prefixed by the the date it was generated

    Jeanette Isele shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base