Skip to content

J. Collins (UBE, SLSP)

My feedback

20 results found

  1. 44 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) commented  · 

    In addition to that, we'd also greatly appreciate the addition of the reporting codes in the po line claim letter (respectively in all acq letters in which they aren't available yet).

  2. 166 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  3. 29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) commented  · 

    Additionally, the Claiming Grace Period (days) from the PO line would be very helpful. This would enable better POL clean-up, for example in preparation for switching from manual to automatic claiming.

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  4. 128 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  5. 193 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear Community,


    This is to update you that we plan to enhance the "Update PO Lines Information" job in a future Alma release. We plan to add 19 new fields to this job:

    Additional PO line reference field
    Cancellation Restriction
    Cancellation Restriction Note
    Add labels
    Remove labels
    Create new label
    Reclaim interval
    Subscription interval
    Note to vendor

    Vendor reference number type 
    Routing during receiving
    Binding during receiving
    Activation note
    Renewal date
    Subscription from
    Subscription to
    Renewal reminder period (days)
    Renewal note
    Internal note


    In addition, the job form will be divided into sections, allowing to easily locate the required field/s to update.


    Please follow up on Alma Release Notes for update on this development.


    Best wishes,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alma Product Team

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) commented  · 

    Also very helpful would be the Reclaim Interval field in the Update PO Line Information job. We would like to activate the automatic claiming job and the field is emtpy in many of our POLs.

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  6. 73 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  7. 82 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  8. 37 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  9. 41 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) shared this idea  · 
  10. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  11. 135 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) shared this idea  · 
  12. 190 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear community, 

    Thank you for raising this idea.


    I would like to better understand the use case here:

    1 How often such check is done? if this is a "cleanup" that is done once in a few month, for example, perhaps an analytics report would be sufficient?

    2 In the description you wrote about the "has inventory" index. Can you give more details, why it is not useful for the described use case?


    Thanks,

    Tamar Fuches

    Alma product team

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  13. 75 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  14. 85 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  15. 49 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  16. 230 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear community,

    Thanks for this idea.

    I would like to make sure that we fully understand the use case:

    1 The need is to allow users to change the currency for PO lines which were packaged and sent.

    Can you please specify the statuses in which this is needed?

    2 Upon such change, funding should be handled: disencumbrance for the original encumbered amount, and a new encumbrance on the fund with the new amount and currency. Is this correct?

    3 The POL should be removed from the original PO, and re-packed. Is this correct?

    4 Should the order be sent to the vendor again?

    Thanks,

    Tamar Fuches

    Alma product

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  17. 497 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Accepted  ·  Dana Moshkovits responded

    When creating a a POL, it will be possible to also define a default item policy and temporary location. This will be used when items are created (by a prediction pattern or manually) on POL or at receive time

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  18. 129 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear Community,


    This is to update you that we plan to enhance the "Update PO Lines  Information" job in a future Alma release. We plan to add 19 new fields  to this job:

    Additional PO line reference field
    Cancellation Restriction
    Cancellation Restriction Note
    Add labels
    Remove labels
    Create new label
    Reclaim interval
    Subscription interval
    Note to vendor

    Vendor reference number type 
    Routing during receiving
    Binding during receiving
    Activation note
    Renewal date
    Subscription from
    Subscription to
    Renewal reminder period (days)
    Renewal note
    Internal note


    In addition, the job form will be divided into sections, allowing to easily locate the required field/s to update.

    Please follow up on Alma Release Notes for update on this development.


    Best wishes,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alma Product Team

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  19. 28 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 
  20. 126 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Dear Community,


    This is to update you that we plan to develop this requirement in a future Alma release.


    We plan to add two fields to the Transactions table display:

    PO Line description

    Creator


    They will be hidden by default, enabling them will be done via the table's customization.


    Please follow up on Alma Release Notes for updates on this development.


    Best wishes,

    Zohar Shemesh

    Alma Product Team

    J. Collins (UBE, SLSP) supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base