F. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne
My feedback
15 results found
-
163 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
82 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
48 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
60 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
85 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
244 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
155 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
188 votes
Dear Community,
This is to update you that we plan to enhance the "Update PO Lines Information" job in a future Alma release. We plan to add 19 new fields to this job:
Additional PO line reference field
Cancellation Restriction
Cancellation Restriction Note
Add labels
Remove labels
Create new label
Reclaim interval
Subscription interval
Note to vendorVendor reference number type
Routing during receiving
Binding during receiving
Activation note
Renewal date
Subscription from
Subscription to
Renewal reminder period (days)
Renewal note
Internal noteIn addition, the job form will be divided into sections, allowing to easily locate the required field/s to update.
Please follow up on Alma Release Notes for update on this development.
Best wishes,
Zohar Shemesh
Alma Product Team
F. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea · -
152 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
104 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
141 votes
This is planned to be developed only for Primo VE.
This will be part of the 2024 roadmap.
F. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea · -
83 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
515 votesF. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·
-
756 votes
Hi all,
We would like to update that this is planned to be developed in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface plans can be found here -
Therefore we are changing the status of this idea to "Planned".
Best regards,
Yael.
F. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea · -
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
656 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
F. Roth @ ZHB Lucerne supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment
ZHB Lucerne strongly supports this request! It is incomprehensible, why filtering for a certain location delivers results where the filtered location is then not displayed in the full view. Absolutely a must have feature.