Paula Coulthard
My feedback
18 results found
-
484 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Paula Coulthard supported this idea · -
26 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
269 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
656 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
Paula Coulthard supported this idea · -
225 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
42 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
16 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
39 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
300 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
42 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
84 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
38 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment Paula Coulthard commentedIt is important to note that the 583 subfield a is currently indexed only in the Holdings record, NOT indexed at all in the bibliographic record (that is where our library is inputting the note as we migrated from another system in 2016 and the note was populated in the bib, not the holdings record).
I will vote for this, but overall, I would like to see indexing of all the note fields in the bibliographic record also (I suppose that is a different Idea Exchange item.!) -
78 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
21 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
38 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
22 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
-
145 votesPaula Coulthard supported this idea ·
Can this be combined with
Collaborative Collections - Index 583 more fully
(which currently has more votes)
?