Stacie Traill
My feedback
16 results found
-
396 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
201 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
199 votes
Thank you for this idea.
We will consider adding the IP address to the Give us Feedback email.
Best regards,
Yael.
Stacie Traill supported this idea · -
212 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
204 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
20 votesStacie Traill shared this idea ·
-
642 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
54 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
24 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
249 votes
We will add this improvement to our roadmap
Stacie Traill supported this idea · -
46 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
30 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
287 votes
We are considering incorporating the idea and effect both templates and rules editing permission
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacie Traill supported this idea · -
28 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Stacie Traill commentedWe would like this option, as well. We frequently pull batches of records out of Alma for external enhancement, and it's necessary to create an itemized set of all records in the original set that were suppressed before overlaying with the enhanced versions, so that the right records can be re-suppressed after the import job runs. This is a lot of extra steps we'd like to avoid.
Stacie Traill supported this idea · -
21 votesStacie Traill supported this idea ·
Yes, I support this idea. We largely have not had issues with this (very few catalogers venture into the Rules area, even though they can), but it definitely makes me nervous. Agree that normalization/merge/indication rules should all be covered.