Matthew Goddard
My feedback
31 results found
-
6 votes
Hi,
We will reach out to Elsevier and ask for the metadata for those collections.
Regards,
Rachel
Senior Content Support Analyst
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
87 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
133 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
Hi
We will reach out to ASM International and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Thanks,
Rachel Harati
Content Product Lead
Matthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesMatthew Goddard
shared this idea
·
-
23 votesMatthew Goddard
supported this idea
·
-
143 votes
-
254 votes
Dear colleagues,
We are pleased to let you know that we have accepted your request to add the fields:
* data type
* section type
to the Counter master reports data in analytics.
All the best,
Shoshana
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
To amplify some points from below:
In COUNTER 5.1, data type is a required field. It is extremely important.
Without it, the Title Master Report is useless.
With 5.1, the Master Reports are now just the "reports". The "standard views" are just that, particular views of the reports. ALL Alma functionality, both SUSHI harvesting and Analytics fields should be focused on the reports, not the views. The "views" should be provided by Alma Analytics according to each institution's needs. This idea is a good starting point to get us there eventually. -
35 votes
-
3 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to De Gruyter and ask for the metadata of the Association of Canadian University Presses collections.
Thanks,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager -
794 votes
Thanks for the examples - we will review them and discuss our options.
Best,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
This may be an unpopular comment, but I'd be surprised if anyone is in a position to start systematically differentiating between peer-reviewed content WITHIN a journal without bringing in a lot of assumptions and guesswork.
Instead, my suggestion would be to make it clearer that this label is applied at the level of the journal. Our facet is already called "Peer reviewed journals", not "peer reviewed articles". Another improvement would be to somehow position the peer-reviewed label adjacent to the journal title, rather than alongside other article-level labels like "review article" and "open access" as it is now.
-
9 votes
Hello,
We will reach out to the provider and ask for the metadata for this collection.
Thanks,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager -
84 votes
-
20 votes
-
10 votes
-
345 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we plan to develop this option in the future. It is not in the current roadmap for this year, and we will update as soon as we have more details about the development planning.
Best regards,
Yael.
-
53 votes
-
269 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Matthew Goddard
commented
When this idea was first suggested seven years ago, there was probably no good way to technically achieve this. There are now multiple solid sources of this data, from organizations willing to share it (Third Iron, Unpaywall, CrossRef, etc.). Data on OA articles in hybrid journals must be integrated into CDI - otherwise search results in Primo are woefully incomplete. This is an urgent problem, as an increasing portion of academic articles are published OA in hybrid journals.
-
141 votes
Please note that it is possible to include only records with active electronic inventory in the Primo search index, by using a Custom Local Data Scope with the condition “ Inventory –- Available electronic -– Exists”. More detailed instructions were shared by Kirsti Thomas on the Alma listserv on March 13, 2024.