Emily Blodget
My feedback
16 results found
-
60 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
20 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
57 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
125 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Emily Blodget supported this idea · -
142 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
27 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
251 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
14 votesEmily Blodget shared this idea ·
-
12 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
201 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
59 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
60 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
26 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
18 votesEmily Blodget supported this idea ·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Emily Blodget commentedHaving a straightforward browse list of all call numbers in order makes it so much easier to assign new call numbers and be confident that I'm not duplicating existing ones. It makes a lot of other tasks easier too.
Emily Blodget supported this idea ·
We have a similar problem since Primo VE can't browse by our state government document call numbers either. We've already had several patrons complain about it, and have had to create a ridiculous workaround for them involving a spreadsheet (which only includes tangible items because of a different lack of functionality...)
https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308176-primo/suggestions/38357878-browse-by-government-document-call-number
It seems Primo VE is extremely limited in its call number browse indexes. Instead of Ex Libris hard-coding in a tiny handful of allowed browse indexes, Could they make it possible for libraries to create their own browse indexes? That would help with both of our situations, I think.
We have good reasons for using these call number schemes, and it's frustrating that Primo VE doesn't support them!