Manu_Schwendener
My feedback
119 results found
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
35 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
More than 50 facet values: 180 votes in the Primo BO to VE Feature Alignment Project
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
226 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Including call number: 226 votes in the Primo BO to VE Feature Alignment Project
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Related:
NERS 8776 Include Holdings library, location, and call number for physical items in the Send To action Export to Excel in Primo VE
Open for voting now.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
+1
-
61 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Screenshots for my earlier comment:
What I'm seeing versus what I should be seeing (= the active filter).
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
NERS 8872 Resource type filter bar: display active filter the same as active facets
Open for voting now.
I should not be seeing this
https://basel.swisscovery.org/discovery/search?query=any,contains,filter&pfilter=rtype,exact,articles&tab=UBS&search_scope=UBS&vid=41SLSP_UBS:live&lang=en&offset=0An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
> This is even more important now with the new pre-search filters [October 2022]
and with the Resource Type Filter Bar, available since May 2023
-
11 votesManu_Schwendener
shared this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
+1
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
> RSS
By now, _some_ pages show in the RSS feed what has been changed, but not all of them.
The screenshot is from this page https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Knowledge_Articles/NERS?v=7 , and the deciding factor must be that it has a version number.
It would be great if this could be done for all pages going forward.
This would be in addition to the points from the first post.
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
+1
-
1 vote
-
28 votesManu_Schwendener
shared this idea
·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
656 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
> In which cases the relation is correct
Dear Yael
For the display and functions of Fulfillment / Getit and facets in Primo, only this example is correct
it has a MARC field 773 $w
773 0#$tPro Natura lokal Basel $g2015, Nr. 4, 31 S. $q2015/4/31 $gyr:2015 $gno:2015 $w(IDSBB)001400350DSV01
----
All the other relations should only be visible under Details in the full record display. There they can be a link which leads to the other bib record, but no other function should be generated.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Basel - UB Hauptbibliothek has this title.
'Show more locations' shows me
Basel - Uni Geschichtewho do NOT have this title.
-----
"Available at ... and other locations"
This is not true. Only "Basel - Uni Philosophie" has it.
---
This is the only case where we want to show "Locations for related titles":
773 0#$tPro Natura lokal Basel $g2015, Nr. 4, 31 S. $q2015/4/31 $gyr:2015 $gno:2015 $w(IDSBB)001400350DSV01
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Dear Yael
This is great to hear, thank you.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
NERS 8781, open for voting now.
Please vote to make our catalog less frustrating for our patrons.
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
114 votes
Thank you for posting this idea. We are considering to have a new toggle
""group versions together" where users can choose to if to have search results grouped by versions or turn it off.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
I changed my mind about the naming. As we call FRBR "versions" it would need to be
Split versions
Bundle versionsor something similar, but also using _versions_.
---
I really like what DTU is doing with their display options pulldown menu
https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=clever, see screenshotFRBR on/off could just be added here. We already have the pulldown for the number of titles per page.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
NERS 8870 - Advanced search: turn off FRBR for the results
Open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Hi
NERS submissions close at the end of this week, and the roadmap will only be presented afterwards. Can somebody from Ex Libris tell me if this is on the roadmap?
Thank you.
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
201 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we are planning to develop this option in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
Dear Yael, thank you for the update.
Same as for other features, if we should be able to use it in Europe, it will have to be
- deactivated by default
- the patrons must actively opt in in their accountsWe got there with the search history, but only after some avoidable detours.
Also take into account that some institutions anomynize their data after a certain amount of time.
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
I like what DTU https://findit.dtu.dk does, see screenshot.
But they don't have an exclude option for facets, and the AND between the different facet groups is not shown, either.An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
> if you could control the Boolean operators
That would be great, yes.
-
756 votes
Hi all,
We would like to update that this is planned to be developed in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface plans can be found here -
Therefore we are changing the status of this idea to "Planned".
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
(NERS 8970 in 2024)
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
”January 2024 SF: 5309566, 5320757, 5326843, 6314072, 6717157, 6796293, 6907653
When using various types of quotation marks within searches, different results were returned. This has been fixed to return the same results regardless of the type of quotation mark used in the query.”Not fixed for me:
Local records:
psychische Belastung = 3164
„psychische Belastung“ = 3262
«psychische Belastung» = 3264
“psychische Belastung” = 1931
"psychische Belastung" = 1931CDI records:
psychische Belastung = 30990
„psychische Belastung“ = 9906
«psychische Belastung» = 30990
“psychische Belastung” = 9906
"psychische Belastung" = 9906An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
According to the January 2024 release notes this should be fixed (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Release_Notes/002Primo_VE/2024/010Primo_VE_2024_Release_Notes?mon=202401BASE) - it isn't.
-
184 votesManu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
113 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
> for the Collection Discovery feature
There's the facet group "New records" in Primo, with "last week", "last month" and "last three months", but they can't be used to build a set that then populates the logical collection.
Manu_Schwendener
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener
commented
+1
Thank you, Ronny, I agree that this should be possible out of the box.