Manu_Schwendener
My feedback
112 results found
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
-
30 votesManu_Schwendener shared this idea ·
-
Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation
659 votesHi all,
We are currently reviewing this idea together with Alma.
We will update with any new information we have.
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commented> In which cases the relation is correct
Dear Yael
For the display and functions of Fulfillment / Getit and facets in Primo, only this example is correct
it has a MARC field 773 $w
773 0#$tPro Natura lokal Basel $g2015, Nr. 4, 31 S. $q2015/4/31 $gyr:2015 $gno:2015 $w(IDSBB)001400350DSV01
----
All the other relations should only be visible under Details in the full record display. There they can be a link which leads to the other bib record, but no other function should be generated.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedBasel - UB Hauptbibliothek has this title.
'Show more locations' shows me
Basel - Uni Geschichtewho do NOT have this title.
-----
"Available at ... and other locations"
This is not true. Only "Basel - Uni Philosophie" has it.
---
This is the only case where we want to show "Locations for related titles":
773 0#$tPro Natura lokal Basel $g2015, Nr. 4, 31 S. $q2015/4/31 $gyr:2015 $gno:2015 $w(IDSBB)001400350DSV01
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedDear Yael
This is great to hear, thank you.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8781, open for voting now.
Please vote to make our catalog less frustrating for our patrons.
Manu_Schwendener supported this idea · -
114 votes
Thank you for posting this idea. We are considering to have a new toggle
""group versions together" where users can choose to if to have search results grouped by versions or turn it off.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedI changed my mind about the naming. As we call FRBR "versions" it would need to be
Split versions
Bundle versionsor something similar, but also using _versions_.
---
I really like what DTU is doing with their display options pulldown menu
https://findit.dtu.dk/en/catalog?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=clever, see screenshotFRBR on/off could just be added here. We already have the pulldown for the number of titles per page.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8870 - Advanced search: turn off FRBR for the results
Open for voting now.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedHi
NERS submissions close at the end of this week, and the roadmap will only be presented afterwards. Can somebody from Ex Libris tell me if this is on the roadmap?
Thank you.
Manu_Schwendener supported this idea · -
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedI like what DTU https://findit.dtu.dk does, see screenshot.
But they don't have an exclude option for facets, and the AND between the different facet groups is not shown, either.An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commented> if you could control the Boolean operators
That would be great, yes.
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commented”January 2024 SF: 5309566, 5320757, 5326843, 6314072, 6717157, 6796293, 6907653
When using various types of quotation marks within searches, different results were returned. This has been fixed to return the same results regardless of the type of quotation mark used in the query.”Not fixed for me:
Local records:
psychische Belastung = 3164
„psychische Belastung“ = 3262
«psychische Belastung» = 3264
“psychische Belastung” = 1931
"psychische Belastung" = 1931CDI records:
psychische Belastung = 30990
„psychische Belastung“ = 9906
«psychische Belastung» = 30990
“psychische Belastung” = 9906
"psychische Belastung" = 9906An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedAccording to the January 2024 release notes this should be fixed (https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Primo/Release_Notes/002Primo_VE/2024/010Primo_VE_2024_Release_Notes?mon=202401BASE) - it isn't.
-
163 votesManu_Schwendener supported this idea ·
-
112 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commented> for the Collection Discovery feature
There's the facet group "New records" in Primo, with "last week", "last month" and "last three months", but they can't be used to build a set that then populates the logical collection.
Manu_Schwendener supported this idea · -
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commented+1
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedDear Moshe
Maybe I misunderstand your reply.
> This option means that no item under the BIB record can be requested when in
> all holding records there is an item available on shelfThis is what Renaud describes and where we are missing an additional option to _enable_ requesting the items from the closed stack, no matter if there is one on a shelf somewhere or not.
Manu_Schwendener supported this idea · -
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedThis would be great
Screenshot is from DTU, which has a lot of elegant solutions.
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedFound this under Configuration – Resource Sharing – Request Forms – Note to Patron
Such a structure would be a huge improvement compared to how we have to manage multilingual labels under Discovery at the moment.
Manu_Schwendener supported this idea · -
198 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8810 Add the ability for patrons to change the default sort
Open for voting now.
-
428 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8967, open for voting now.
Manu_Schwendener supported this idea · -
314 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8947, open for voting now.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8992 open for voting now.
-
40 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedRelated:
NERS 8814 User-defined favorite libraries that get preferential ranking in the Get It section and Libraries facetOpen for voting now.
-
94 votes
This is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.
Currently we are removing the "Under review" status.
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8959, open for voting now.
---
Update 2.4.2024: place 4 in NERS, round 1
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Manu_Schwendener commentedNERS 8838, open for voting now.
+1