Skip to content

Jahn

← Have an idea for Ex Libris?

My feedback

3 results found

  1. Improve resource accessibility with a new field «Request accessible document» in “Digitization optional parameters”

    45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Primo » User Interface  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jahn commented  · 

    We agree that this idea would be valuable to our users with disabillities and feel that would fit well with Ex Libris' commitment to DEI issues.
    Additionally, we think that it may be helpful if the user was able to specify the needed level or form of accessibility.

    Jahn supported this idea  · 

  2. Display related holdings for monographs only for the 773 $w relation and not for the 8xx $w relation

    656 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    20 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Jahn supported this idea  · 

  3. Discovery collections handling

    82 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Jahn supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)