Tania Hewes
My feedback
4 results found
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tania Hewes shared this idea · -
48 votes
Dear community,
I would like to update you that this idea is planned to be developed. Thew planned solution will allow to limit users to be able to install/use only cloud apps that they have the proper roles for operating, meaning - users will not be able to install/use a cloud app they do not have the required roles to operate it. And, it will support the option for enabling the use of cloud apps only for users that are specifically chosen (by giving them a dedicated role for that), Meaning - users will be able to install/use cloud apps only if they were given a dedicated role for that.
If nothing will come up during development, this is currently planned to be released in 2024 H2.
Thanks,
Uri Beladev
Library Platform, Product Management team
An error occurred while saving the comment Tania Hewes commentedNote: I am not the person who proposed this
My preference would be Both
A user should have a role like CLOUD_APP_OPERATOR
AND
be able to install/use only cloud apps that they have the proper roles for operatingTania Hewes supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment Tania Hewes commentedThis is sorely needed. Some existing cloud apps enable data modifications that not everyone in an institution would ideally have access to.
-
11 votesTania Hewes shared this idea ·
-
107 votesTania Hewes supported this idea ·
For me the biggest reason is the third reason I list above "Items in work orders are requestable unless further changes are made to the items or to configurations. Using a type=UNAVAILABLE location accomplishes the un-requestability without needing to do any other configuration or data changes"
Your customers are asking to have a simpler way to accomplish something they need to do. Specifically we are asking that the Location type=Unavailable be more fully functional than it is at present.
There are additional comments on the other post that support this.