Nikki DeMoville
My feedback
51 results found
-
48 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
763 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Nikki DeMoville supported this idea · -
253 votes
Dear colleagues,
We are pleased to let you know that we have accepted your request to add the fields:
* data type
* section type
to the Counter master reports data in analytics.
All the best,
Shoshana
Nikki DeMoville supported this idea · -
52 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
96 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
55 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
156 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
32 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
180 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
37 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
219 votes
A new task will be added to the tasks widget, alerting catalogers when reminders' date arrives.
Nikki DeMoville supported this idea · -
153 votes
The “ignore_lender_due_date” parameter will be handled as a default value. A configuration option on the partner record will enable to override its value.
Nikki DeMoville supported this idea · -
1 voteNikki DeMoville shared this idea ·
-
2 votesNikki DeMoville shared this idea ·
-
72 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nikki DeMoville supported this idea · -
34 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
27 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
149 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
36 votesNikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
-
167 votes
Hi all,
This is planned to be handled in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
Nikki DeMoville supported this idea ·
I literally stole a vote from something else to vote for this. Why? Taylor & Francis and their recent change from "access back to 1997" to "20 year rolling backfile." The current system works acceptably for simple current subscriptions, but it's very confusing for closed titles (canceled, ceased, title changes).
e.g. we have a title that has rolling 20 year backfile access + ceased in 2012. What our users now see is
Available until 2012 volume: 46 issue: 1
Most recent 20 year(s) available
Clearly both statements in the above cannot be true.
I'd like to add on to Jen's idea by asking that the statement not only be combined with other local coverage but also that the wording be made both simpler and more context specific: "Available from xx year(s) ago to ..." when local holdings have an end date, and "... to xx year(s) ago" when local holdings have a start date.
Ideally, in my example, I'd like to see
Available from 20 year(s) ago until 2012 volume: 46 issue: 1
Jen's example would look like this:
Available from 1923 to 12 year(s) ago