Blake Galbreath
My feedback
30 results found
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Blake Galbreath supported this idea · -
34 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
26 votesBlake Galbreath shared this idea ·
-
3 votesBlake Galbreath shared this idea ·
-
12 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
11 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
26 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
269 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
51 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
40 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
19 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
15 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
391 votesBlake Galbreath shared this idea ·
-
78 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
21 votesBlake Galbreath shared this idea ·
-
419 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
11 votesBlake Galbreath shared this idea ·
-
52 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
299 votesBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
-
6 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Ex Libris) respondedBlake Galbreath supported this idea ·
@Manu. I don't think so. Rapido introduced this problem, because they didn't create a new Rapido-centric form. Also, I am not sure why we have Rapido and RapidILL separately here, when we vote for them together in NERS. I would therefore personally vote to leave the request here.