V. Niemi
My feedback
18 results found
-
141 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment V. Niemi supported this idea · -
40 votes
-
6 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
12 votesV. Niemi shared this idea ·
-
125 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment V. Niemi commented++1
V. Niemi supported this idea · -
94 votes
-
1 voteV. Niemi shared this idea ·
-
21 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
-
59 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
154 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
4 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
115 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
357 votes
We are looking into improvements that can be made to the Primo VE form, such as:
- Add a custom notice or message to the form
- Improve the form fields’ responsiveness to the requested format (book/article and physical/digital)
- Look into ways to enhance the configurability of the look and feel for the form
An error occurred while saving the comment V. Niemi commentedPreferably also a possiblity to choose whether to use <input> or <textarea>. For example comment fields would greatly benefit from a <textarea>. On top of this, choosing maxlength character wise would be useful at times.
V. Niemi supported this idea · -
193 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
121 votesV. Niemi supported this idea ·
-
203 votes
A new 'Purged request fee' will be configurable for Hold Request TOU, similar to the one that already exists for booking requests. When the Expired Hold task list is used with one of the 'Reshelve', 'Transit' or 'Activate Next' functions then the request TOU will be consulted, and a fee will be created accordingly.
V. Niemi supported this idea ·
+1