Skip to content

Rebecca Bearden

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Bearden supported this idea  · 
  2. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Bearden supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Bearden commented  · 

    We have encountered this issue as well. The workaround solution is that you can export your portfolios using the extended export, wipe this non-editable field out and reimport the portfolios. However, the search index in Alma pulls from both the non-editable field (Parser parameters field) AND the Static URL field, so if you do not remove the parser parameter URLs via the process I just described, and you are trying to search in Alma for errors/updates needed in the URL field for a group of portfolios, the task is near impossible since you keep getting the outdated URL's results as well. Bottom line: each unique URL field should be separately indexed in Alma.

  3. 15 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Bearden shared this idea  · 
  4. 35 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Bearden supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Bearden supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Rebecca Bearden commented  · 

    In the new UI, the location of the receiving note is up in the far right and is very easy to not notice. Even if it stays where its located, making it a bright color, or treating it like a pop up notice like routing and binding if something is written in it would help bring attention to it during the receiving process!

  6. 164 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Rebecca Bearden supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base