Knut A Bøckman
My feedback
26 results found
-
53 votesKnut A Bøckman shared this idea ·
-
112 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Knut A Bøckman supported this idea · -
9 votesKnut A Bøckman shared this idea ·
-
64 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
-
8 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
40 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
24 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
257 votesKnut A Bøckman shared this idea ·
-
44 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Knut A Bøckman commentedAgreed, and this information should also be available for intra-institutional transit (e.g., from one library to another, or to a work order department). Currently, the available elements are calculated_destination_name and delivery_address, both of which are populated with the destination library name only. We would like to be able to display the address information that is already in place in Alma.
Knut A Bøckman supported this idea · -
208 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
22 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Knut A Bøckman commentedSo here's an idea of how this could be done: on locations of type, say "Closed" and "Remote Storage" (or any type not "Open") have a check box to indicate if call number should be displayed or not. No end user will need to know the call number of items in such locations.
Knut A Bøckman supported this idea ·Knut A Bøckman shared this idea · -
44 votesKnut A Bøckman shared this idea ·
-
22 votesKnut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
-
43 votes
-
31 votesKnut A Bøckman shared this idea ·
-
764 votes
This improvement is planned for the 2024 Roadmap.
Knut A Bøckman supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment Knut A Bøckman commentedExcellent idea, and convincingly argued. Thanks for posting; there went my last votes (only 2, unfortunately)
-
313 votes
We’re looking at adding an indication in the Manage In Process Items next to a request where there are more digitization requests for the same item in the queue. A row action will allow the staff to complete the current active request and activate the next.
An error occurred while saving the comment Knut A Bøckman commentedsounds more like a bug than an enhancement tbh, but I'll spend some of my precious votes just to get it fixed :)
Knut A Bøckman supported this idea · -
34 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Knut A Bøckman commentedThank you for creating this idea - it will be a great improvement
Knut A Bøckman supported this idea ·
A job like this would be very helpful - when can we see it implemented?