Laura Akerman
My feedback
35 results found
-
28 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
78 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
118 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Akerman
commented
Ah, that is a problem! Sorry I missed looking at the attachment.
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Akerman
commented
I don't understand this request - can't you just add the subfield p to your normalization rules for diplay/title? It seems to be in the ALMA MARC template for Primo so I'm assuming you lack it because your rules have been around awhile and don't have it.
Our subfield p's are displaying - including in the e-shelf. Here's an example:
http://discovere.emory.edu/discovere:default_scope:01EMORY_ALMA21159316240002486
This shouldn't need to be an enhancement. -
205 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that this is currently not planned to be developed. We might evaluate it again in the future.
Therefore we are removing the "Under review" status for now.
Best regards,
Yael.
Laura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesLaura Akerman
shared this idea
·
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Akerman
commented
I see this is also a NERS enhancement. Don't remember adding it there, but hope it can get some notice. We had another mysterious batch of 8 errors today - this time, the load was so small that the pipe errored out. But I wonder how many more like this have been happening. Hopefully we can diagnose the problem on the Alma end soon.
Laura Akerman
shared this idea
·
-
37 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Laura Akerman
commented
I just had another front desk person complain about this today. RTA status "Checkedout" for missing items confuses patrons ("I thought you'd found it and checked it out to somebody else! I wanted dibs!). We've talked about just making the label "Unavailable" but that might send a different kind of message ("You can't get it ever").
-
21 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesLaura Akerman
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesLaura Akerman
supported this idea
·
Oops, I'm out of votes but let me lend support for this.
I'd like it to be something we could handle in normalization rules and something we could control on the individual record basis if need be.
We did all kinds of extremely time-wasting workarounds to get, for example, our print serial records to come out on tip of the skimpy SFX serial records (basically, by adding 856's to them so they would become "electronic").
Now that we're no longer using SFX, and Alma Community Zone records are "better" for the most part, we still occasionally see dedups where the choice of preferred record is unfortunate. Nothing we can do....
I could swear that at one time, I saw a configuration for choice of preferred record for dedups... in some odd place like the General Configuration maybe... but I can't find it now.