1697 results found

1. Allow keyboard shortcuts/hot keys to be configurable

   Allow for the creation of keyboard shortcut/hot key profiles that will support re-mapping of shortcuts. Some of the preset shortcut are not currently available due to the removal of function keys by manufacturers.

   stares at Apple

   It would be a nice touch to let customers share the shortcut profiles among each other as well.

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Column and/or filter for Privacy in Manage Sets

   In Manage Sets it would be really helpful if there was a column to show if a set was Private or Not, and a filter for Privacy (Yes/No).

   This would help when I'm trying to delete from "My Sets" or All Sets" tab. To make sure I don't break someone's business process I need to go into each set to check the privacy before I delete a set.

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Update invoice information in batch

   Since we have to approve a lot of invoices and input the same payment information to a pile of invoices, is it possible to 1) set a certain number of invoices as a set and approve them in batch, and 2) update invoice payment information in batch as a job (similar to update PO line information)? Detailed information are as follows.

   1. Add invoices as sets Add invoice to ‘set content type’, and enable add contents from file to set so that a certain number of invoices can be grouped as a set.
   2. Add new jobs a. Update invoice status Approve/send back to review invoices as a set in batch. b. Update invoice information during ‘waiting for payment’ session This is similar to update PO line information job, enable user to set payment status, input payment identifier and set payment date in batch for invoices as a set.

   Since we have to approve a lot of invoices and input the same payment information to a pile of invoices, is it possible to 1) set a certain number of invoices as a set and approve them in batch, and 2) update invoice payment information in batch as a job (similar to update PO line information)? Detailed information are as follows.

   1. Add invoices as sets Add invoice to ‘set content type’, and enable add contents from file to set so that a certain number of invoices can be grouped as a set.
   2. Add new jobs a. Update invoice status Approve/send… more
   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Acquisition - Invoices  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Navigating list of records

   Would like to have a forward option when working in a list of catalog records. It's cumbersome to have to go backward to go forward to the next record in the list.

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Metadata Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Differentiate “regular” Hold Request and Interested User Request or Change “Interested User Check” Order

   Because Alma does not have the granularity to separate an Interested User request and a regular hold request, our Interested User hold process does not work.

   When the “Non-Requestable Processes Fulfillment Unit Rule or Change Order” is configured to prevent “in process” items from being requestable, any items that have an Interested User that are in our Technical Services Work Order are treated as “in process” and therefore, the interested user request is blocked. While we do not want most “In Process” items to be requestable, we do want our Interested User requests to be fulfilled.

   Because of this configuration, the following workflow does not allow Interested User hold to process: When the item is marked “Done” from the Technical Services workflow, two actions occur (per Ex Libris): the first action is checking for an interested user and an attempt to create a hold request. The Second is to clear the “in process” type and move the item to the next process type. Because of the order of operations, the item is still “In Process” when Alma checks for Interested Users, so the hold is not allowed, due to our Fulfillment Unit Rule.

   If there can be a way to either differentiate between a “regular” hold request and one from an interested user, perhaps that granularity can be applied so that the Interested User hold function can work without changing our Fulfillment Rule. Or, if the Interested User check and hold request can be made after the item is cleared from the “in process” type, then the hold would apply.

   Because Alma does not have the granularity to separate an Interested User request and a regular hold request, our Interested User hold process does not work.

   When the “Non-Requestable Processes Fulfillment Unit Rule or Change Order” is configured to prevent “in process” items from being requestable, any items that have an Interested User that are in our Technical Services Work Order are treated as “in process” and therefore, the interested user request is blocked. While we do not want most “In Process” items to be requestable, we do want our Interested User requests to be fulfilled.

   Because of this configuration,… more

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Fulfillment - Requests  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Copyright Work Percentage Rule

   It should be possible to apply the Copyright Work Percentage Rule for:
   1. Patron Digitization Requests
   2. RS Borrowing requests

   And not just for:
   1. Staff Digitization Requests
   2. Library Physical Digitization Requests

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Resource Sharing  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Add the ability to upload EDI files from FTP sites manually

   Currently, Alma will only allow you to manually upload an EDI invoice file from a local folder. If you map an FTP site shortcut to your desktop and attempt to manually upload the EDI invoice file from that location, it will say there is an error. I have confimed that Alma does not currently support manual EDI invoice file uploading from ftp sites, only when you configure it to run automatically.

   Import profiles support both processes, so it seems like this area of Alma should support both manual and automatic uploads from FTP sites as well.

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Acquisitions - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Changes made to Enumeration D - H, and Chronology K & M should appear in the item History tab

   At this time, only changes made to the Enumeration Fields A-C, Chronology I-J, and Chronology L appear in the item record under the History tab; we would like for changes made to any of the Enumeration and Chronology fields to appear in the History tab of the item record.

   If Alma is offering the use of 13 different enum/chron fields, they should all follow the same rules. Emphasis should not be given to just a handful of these fields, because many institutions use more than the 6 most popular fields.

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Resource Management - Physical  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Improve OpenURL generation to remove blanks and duplicates

   Openurls generated could by Alma/Primo be shorted by:

   1. Not sending duplicate parameters.
   2. Not sending empty parameters.

   Background:

   We have noticed that OpenURLs produced by Alma/Primo (which are then sent on to our ILLiad server, which can require redirection to get the patron authenticated) can be VERY long. So long in fact, that they can produce errors for our ILLiad web server. The ILLiad server will end up reporting "Request header is too large", and the user is left with a HTTP Status 400 Bad request error.

   We believe the responsibility here is on the Alma/PRimo side as the urls generated could be shorted by:

   1. Not sending duplicate parameters.
   2. Not sending empty parameters.

   Note: For our (UW-Madison's) locally developed discovery interface, we generate our own OpenURL links for things like "Request a copy" from article searching and the catalog records, so we can ensure proper length limits.

   ExLibris generates OpenURL links in their UResolver (Find it) and Primo Search API

   Alma/Primo OpenURLs

   For example, following a "Find it at UW-Madison" link from Google Scholar and then doing "Request a copy" (sending the OpenURL on to our ILLiad server):

   Starting in Google Sholar, and ending up here:
   https://uwi-primoalma-prod.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/openurl?sid=google&auinit=PM&aulast=Vitousek&atitle=Beyond%20global%20warming:%20ecology%20and%20global%20change&id=doi:10.2307%2F1941591&title=Ecology.&volume=75&issue=7&date=1994&spage=1861&issn=0012-9658&vid=WISC&institution=WISC&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true

   Provides an OpenURL link (request a copy) of:

   https://madison.hosts.atlas-sys.com/illiad/OpenURL?Action=10&Form=30&rft.genre=article&rft.title=Ecology.&rft.stitle=Ecology.&rft.atitle=Beyond+global+warming%3A+ecology+and+global+change&rft.jtitle=Ecology.&rft.au=&rft.date=1994&rft.month=&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=7&rft.number=&rft.spage=1861&rft.epage=&rft.edition=&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.aulast=Vitousek&rft.aufirst=&rft.auinit=PM&rft.pub=Brooklyn+Botanical+Garden&rft.pubdate=1920-&rft.pubyear=&rft.publisher=Brooklyn+Botanical+Garden&rft.place=Brooklyn%2C+NY+%3A&rft.doi=10.2307%2F1941591&rfe_dat=35698209&rfr_id=google

   Where the following parameters are included, yet blank:

   au, month, number, epage, edition, aufirst, pubyear

   Primo Search API

   In order to display electronic availability for articles we have to query the OpenURL resolver in alma to get data back. The string we use to query the resolver is provided to us by the Primo Search API

   Primo API Docs - Ex Libris Developer Network

   This one is by far the biggest offender, as that API returns the "GetIt1" URL we need to use. An example URL returned to us looks like:

   https://na02.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/uresolver/01UWI_MAD/openurl?svc_dat=CTO&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_id=10_1&ctx_tim=2020-02-07T10%3A04%3A19IST&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofifmt:kev:mtx:ctx&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info:sidprimo.exlibrisgroup.com-proquest&req_id=&rft_val_fmt=info:ofifmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Telltale%20warming%20likely%20to%20hit%20poorer%20countries%20first&rft.jtitle=Nature&rft.btitle=&rft.aulast=Schiermeier&rft.auinit=&rft.auinit1=&rft.auinitm=&rft.ausuffix=&rft.au=Schiermeier,%20Quirin&rft.aucorp=&rft.date=2018-04-26&rft.volume=556&rft.issue=7702&rft.part=&rft.quarter=&rft.ssn=&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=415-416&rft.artnum=&rft.issn=00280836&rft.eissn=14764687&rft.isbn=&rft.sici=&rft.coden=&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038d41586-018-04854-2&rft.object_id=&rft.eisbn=&rft.edition=&rft.pub=Nature%20Publishing%20Group&rft.place=London&rft.series=&rft.stitle=&rft.bici=&rft_id=info:bibcode&rft_id=info:hdl&rft_id=info:lccn&rft_id=info:oclcnum&rft_id=info:pmid&rft_id=info:eric((addataeric}}&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2056433252%3Cproquest%3E%3Curl%3Ehttp:search.proquest.com/docview/2056433252/%3C/url%3E,language=eng,view=MD&svc_dat=viewit&req.skin=MADskin&rft_pqid=2056433252&rft_galeid=572639507&rft_cupid=&rft_eruid=&rft_nurid=&rft_ingid=

   Previously we ran this URL through a parser to validate it and then remove empty parameters. There are three issues with this data - 1) sometimes keys are duplicated, which goes against best practices 2) Data is not properly url encoded 3) There are a lot of empty parameters.

   Removing those parameters for this example request would drop the length of the URL from 1328 to 1052 characters

   Note: We no longer parse this data as it was dropping the duplicated parameters causing lookup issues, so it's passed through to our OpenURL resolver as we receive it from the API (aside from prepending a parameter to return XML instead of HTML)

   Openurls generated could by Alma/Primo be shorted by:

   1. Not sending duplicate parameters.
   2. Not sending empty parameters.

   Background:

   We have noticed that OpenURLs produced by Alma/Primo (which are then sent on to our ILLiad server, which can require redirection to get the patron authenticated) can be VERY long. So long in fact, that they can produce errors for our ILLiad web server. The ILLiad server will end up reporting "Request header is too large", and the user is left with a HTTP Status 400 Bad request error.

   We believe the responsibility here is on the Alma/PRimo side as the urls generated… more

   15 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Collaborative Networks  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Only send Ful Item Change Due Date Letter for changes to due date

    We've run into a real problem with recalls. We can set some items to be recallable, and others to not be recallable. However, both categories get their status changed to "Recalled." Non-recallable items simply don't get a change to their due date. Despite this, patrons who have checked out non-recallable items still get the Change Due Date letter, with a notice that tells them their due date has not actually changed. This letter currently is triggered by recalls with due date changes, recalls without due date changes, other due date changes, or recall cancellations. We think this is too much to cover with one letter, as we don't want to send the notice when there's no date change, though we do want to send it when there is a date change.

    So I'd like to propose that this letter be broken out into two separate letters: one for due date changes, and one for loan status updates without due date changes. That would allow us to deactivate or activate as desired.

    We've run into a real problem with recalls. We can set some items to be recallable, and others to not be recallable. However, both categories get their status changed to "Recalled." Non-recallable items simply don't get a change to their due date. Despite this, patrons who have checked out non-recallable items still get the Change Due Date letter, with a notice that tells them their due date has not actually changed. This letter currently is triggered by recalls with due date changes, recalls without due date changes, other due date changes, or recall cancellations. We think this is too much… more

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Fulfillment - General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Manage Cataloger Roles at the Library Level

    We would like the roles Catalog Administrator, Catalog Manager, Cataloger, and Cataloger Extended to be set at the Library level instead of the Institution level. We have special collections that we only want only some of our staff to edit. Assigning catalogers to one or more libraries is much more efficient than assigning cataloging levels to users and records.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Metadata Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Allow the font to be changed/enlarged in the MD Editor

    In the MD Editor it is currently impossible to change the font size or type. Could this please be changed? Catalogers expect this functionality, as both Voyager Cataloging and the OCLC Connexion client allow users to change the font size and type. Thank you for considering this request.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Metadata Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. RS - show more fields (such as Note) for Partner when using Add partner

    When selecting a Partner in Resource Sharing Borrowing Request , one can only see 4 fields (see attachment) for the Partner. It would be useful if other fields, such as Note , might be enabled. There are many criteria and information helpful when slecting a partner, and in the real world they are often saved in the Note field, and this field should be visible at the step of selecting the partner.

    •  

    •  

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Resource Sharing  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Add Fine/Fee ID and Transaction ID columns to User Details Fines/Fees tab

    In the Fines/Fees tab of the User Details screen add Fine/Fee ID and Transaction ID to the list of columns that staff can choose to display. Currently the Fine/Fee ID and Transaction ID is only accessible via an Analytics report and thus aren’t available until the next day after any updates to the user’s fine/fees occur. Our staff need these IDs when troubleshooting fine/fee problems which means that users are negatively impacted by the Analytics lag time.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Fulfillment - Fines &Fees  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Add ability to customize the data exported by Bursar integration profile using System = Other

    When creating an integration profile of type Bursar which uses a ‘System’ setting of ‘Other’ there should be more granular control over what data is included in the export.

    If a ‘System’ setting of ‘Other’ is selected, then a 'Data' tab should be made available which will allow you to select via checkbox what fines/fees and user data is included in the exported file. The data available should at minimum include, but not necessarily be limited to, what is accessible via API.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  APIs and Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Add export start/effective date to Bursar integration profile configuration settings

    When creating a new Bursar integration profile, we want to be able to limit the transactions being exported to only those generated after a specific date. This is in addition to ‘Time before export (days)’ setting. We've never used an integration profile to export fines/fees to be transferred to our bursar office and have instead used the API. We're now stuck in a situation where we can't switch to using an integration profile because without a start/effective date there's no way to prevent the exported files from creating double billing of transactions that have already been transferred to our bursar via API.

    When creating a new Bursar integration profile, we want to be able to limit the transactions being exported to only those generated after a specific date. This is in addition to ‘Time before export (days)’ setting. We've never used an integration profile to export fines/fees to be transferred to our bursar office and have instead used the API. We're now stuck in a situation where we can't switch to using an integration profile because without a start/effective date there's no way to prevent the exported files from creating double billing of transactions that have already been transferred to our bursar… more

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  APIs and Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Add option "PO Line Type" in "Request attributes"

    We think the possibility to choose "Order Line Type" under "Request Attributes" would be helpful when editing a purchase request

    •  

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Acquisition - Purchase Requests  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Add management information when publishing authority records using OAI-PMH

    We want to publish our local authority data to a third party system. Adding management information such as Creation date, Modification date, Created by, etc. would be extremely valuable. Yet, management information enrichment is available for other kind of records, but not authorities (cf. in the documentation page https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/090Integrations_with_External_Systems/030Resource_Management/080Publishing_and_Inventory_Enrichment).
    Could you please add manangement information when publishing authority records using OAI-PMH?

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Metadata Management  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Enable setting of Personal Delivery Locations from Resource Sharing Form

    In November 2023, The following was developed for holds based on this Idea Exchange suggestion Allow users to enter an address for home delivery – Have an idea for Ex Libris? (exlibrisgroup.com) We would like to have the same functionality available for the Resource Sharing Form as well. Our consortium policy allows for home delivery of materials from another's library. Obviously, this might not be welcome for all but without this functionality, we cannot see it being feasible to turn on this functionality for just local requests.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Resource Sharing  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Add a date measure to Digital Inventory/Usage Analytics

    For Digital Inventory/Usage, we can only see total (cumulative) downloads and views. It would be helpful to have a date measure to see usage over time for digital files.

    15 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Analytics  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close