Peta Hopkins
My feedback
99 results found
-
29 votesPeta Hopkins supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
10 votesPeta Hopkins supported this idea ·
-
18 votesPeta Hopkins shared this idea ·
-
275 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commented+1
-
0 votesPeta Hopkins shared this idea ·
-
1 votePeta Hopkins shared this idea ·
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedNo votes left, but I would support this. While the ILRS code (ALIA) advises that ensuring copyright compliance is the requesting library's responsibility, we are periodically messaged by some lending libraries asking us to confirm before they will supply. This would streamline the process.
-
30 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedNice idea
-
49 votesPeta Hopkins shared this idea ·
-
22 votesPeta Hopkins supported this idea ·
-
0 votesPeta Hopkins supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedAt minimum the list selection options should work consistently with those in CiteIt too.
Peta Hopkins supported this idea · -
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedIs this still the case for CDI records?
-
140 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedI'd like to see this functionality extended to batch submission of resource sharing requests too. So important for researchers/higher degree research students who are submitting many requests.
It would need some thinking through that the type of request that should be created in Alma would depend on whether it is determined to be a hold request or digital copy request or physical resource sharing request. Quite complex.
-
235 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedNo votes. But I support more flexibility with jobs.
-
5 votesPeta Hopkins shared this idea ·
-
174 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedThere would be a need to account for user declaring that the request is within copyright limitations. Or someway to include a link in the rejection letter so that the user can then submit a resource sharing request and tick the © check box.
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedYes please. This would be really helpful to us. We cannot specify a publication date range for when a purchase request link should be shown instead of a resource sharing request. This would help us streamline the process for customers, if for whatever reason we are unable to purchase.
Peta Hopkins supported this idea · -
0 votesPeta Hopkins shared this idea ·
-
48 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedSounds like a very useful feature
-
315 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Peta Hopkins commentedThere goes my last Primo vote. Thanks for sharing this idea.
Peta Hopkins supported this idea ·
Most of ours have a single representation so this has not been too painful for us. That said it has probably influenced us in how we have chosen to set up journals (each article or issue) gets its own bibliographic record, rather than them all be attached to a single bib. I'd like the flexibility to better support journals/volumes/issues/articles hierarchy and UX.
I found an example of a book with 2 volumes. Each volume has separate files for the chapters. https://librarysearch.bond.edu.au/permalink/61BOND_INST/ivhunt/alma9930443192602381
In Primo the representation could be highlighted to indicate which ones contain the search terms, but then the user ends up with 10 or more files to choose from when they land in the Alma viewer.
For optimum experience the user could be helped towards the actual file. Natasha, would something like this screen shot be what you had in mind at least in the Primo side?