Peta Hopkins
My feedback
141 results found
-
48 votes
-
22 votes
-
3 votes
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
9 votes
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Is this still the case for CDI records?
-
81 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment +1 (no votes left)
-
135 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I'd like to see this functionality extended to batch submission of resource sharing requests too. So important for researchers/higher degree research students who are submitting many requests.
It would need some thinking through that the type of request that should be created in Alma would depend on whether it is determined to be a hold request or digital copy request or physical resource sharing request. Quite complex.
-
235 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment No votes. But I support more flexibility with jobs.
-
5 votes
-
201 votes
Hi all,
This is to update that we are planning to develop this option in the Primo Next Discovery Experience User Interface.
More details on the new interface planning can be found here -
Best regards,
Yael.
An error occurred while saving the comment Hi @Nili - is there an update on this? Just wondering given the amount of support for it, and that NERS submissions are open. I don't want to submit a NERS request if it is already in the pipeline.
An error occurred while saving the comment It would be helpful to direct them to this when they submit requests for things that we have already supplied to them.
-
202 votes
We are considering adding a field to the course record in Alma, reportable in Analytics, for the faculty/school. It could be used for reporting purposes but not for discovery purposes. In other words, you would be able to pull list usage by faculty/school, but end users would not be able to browse by faculty/school. Would it still be helpful?
An error occurred while saving the comment I see this was going to be added to the roadmap back in Dec 2018. An update on this would be great.
-
141 votes
This is planned to be developed only for Primo VE.
This will be part of the 2024 roadmap.
-
5 votes
We plan to add the following options for the new UI:
Advanced search:
1. Select from Contains, Contains exact phrase, Starts with
2. Search by DOI
3. Type and Availability filters on the Advanced search page
4. Filter by publication date: Specific year, Last 2 years, Last 5 years, etc.
Search results:
5. Select multiple filters for type or availability with OR operator between. Example, Book or Book chapter
An error occurred while saving the comment This was set to Accepted in 2020. It would be great to have an update on where this is at, which search features have/are being included.
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS request 7689 for enhanced advanced search has been submitted for voting in 2022 - has some overlap with this idea.
-
21 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS request 7688 submitted 13 January 2022. Please consider voting for this in the next round.
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment NERS request 7688 submitted 13 January 2022 - Please consider voting for this in the 2022 round of voting.
-
16 votes
-
161 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment There would be a need to account for user declaring that the request is within copyright limitations. Or someway to include a link in the rejection letter so that the user can then submit a resource sharing request and tick the © check box.
An error occurred while saving the comment Yes please. This would be really helpful to us. We cannot specify a publication date range for when a purchase request link should be shown instead of a resource sharing request. This would help us streamline the process for customers, if for whatever reason we are unable to purchase.
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Rapido request forms have the © details embedded in the request form. :).
An error occurred while saving the comment The less clicks the better :)
-
0 votes
At minimum the list selection options should work consistently with those in CiteIt too.