Dear Lukas thank you for proposing this old NERS request as idea. Both approaches, copy NR subset (statically) or include NR subset (dynamically) are useful. We preferred in our original NERS proposal the latter approach because it allows to use subset of NR as routines in a procedural language, and in case of update of the NR subset, any change would have been applied automatically to/inherited by all NR using that included subset.
On the other hand statically copying pieces of rules - as you propose in this idea - allows to use them as templates and it's perhaps easier to implement. Which might also be a factor.
Under the circumstances, any of the two solutions would be welcomed.
Luigi Siciliano
Dear Lukas thank you for proposing this old NERS request as idea. Both approaches, copy NR subset (statically) or include NR subset (dynamically) are useful. We preferred in our original NERS proposal the latter approach because it allows to use subset of NR as routines in a procedural language, and in case of update of the NR subset, any change would have been applied automatically to/inherited by all NR using that included subset.
On the other hand statically copying pieces of rules - as you propose in this idea - allows to use them as templates and it's perhaps easier to implement. Which might also be a factor.
Under the circumstances, any of the two solutions would be welcomed.