Alma
Your feedback matters to us. Help us improve Alma by telling us what you’d like to see using the message areas below. You can also can support something already posted.
We would love to be able to respond to every idea that is submitted, but this is not feasible. We are, however, committed to responding to the most popular ideas—those that have received the most points.
For more information please review our FAQ and guidelines. Thank you.
88 results found
-
Order lines - Customize view: please add "Acquisition method"
Our colleagues are missing the field "Acquisition method" in the results list when searching for PO Lines.
Currently the field is only a facets value but this will also not add the field to the Excel export file.
Thank you in advance!49 votes -
Manage EDI Tasks - Addition of Fund Code column
The addition of a sortable Fund Code column within Manage EDI Tasks would be incredibly useful for us. We use two strands of ordering at our institution, depending on if a title is required for research or teaching. The addition of a fund code column would allow staff to easily identify the EDI Tasks for their area.
47 votes -
Add fund name to communication letter and po line claim letter
When starting a communication with a vendor the body field is pre-populated. Unfortunately, the fund name is missing. We would like to have to option to add the fund name in the communication letter (via letters configuration).
44 votes -
Ability to define a shipping address per PO line
We need the ability to define a different shipping address than the library billing address per PO line. The address should be included in the XML of all vendor-facing letters, be searchable, and be included in the Excel lists exported from the search results.
Use Cases:
- A central library manages subscriptions to journals and newspapers that are sent directly to end users by the vendor.
- Several libraries are integrated into a single Library in Alma but send orders independently to vendors, expecting delivery to their local addresses.43 votes -
Reopening closed POLs should re-encumber funds
Currently re-opening a closed POL doesn’t re-encumber the funds. The workaround for this is to delete the fund, save the change, then add the fund back and save again.
When we brought this up with Ex Libris they advised this can't be done automatically, but that they would instead add a popup message advising the funds will need to be manually re-encumbered. This was supposed to be added in December 2016 release but we noticed some time later that it didn't eventuate (SalesForce case #00436654).
It would save a lot of time if re-opening a closed POL automatically re-encumbered the…
42 votes -
Allow edits to POL Bib Descriptions on Cancelled POLs
We want to be able to edit the POL Bib Description fields on cancelled POLs without having to reopen the POL. Reopening a cancelled order on a closed ledger causes complications, especially if the fund doesn't exist in the current ledger. It would be better for your users if we could just edit this tab without impacting the POL status. Thank you!
42 votes -
Renewal POL : free the box "Manual Packaging"
When we renew POL, we would like to be able to tick or not tick the box "Manual Packaging".
Our aim is to not heritage the Packaging from the 1rst POL / PO, but to decide to re-package POL as wanted.41 votes -
PO Line for Standing Orders: Renewal field
when creating a POL for a standing order, the Renewal field is required before the order can be saved/sent. But the whole point of a standing order is that I don't have to do anything to renew it; the vendor just keeps sending them. This should not be a required field; it's clogging up my renewals because I there is no action needed on my part.
41 votes -
Improve po_line_remove_interested_users_job
The polineremoveinterestedusers job allows institutions to delete Interested Users from PO lines that have closed. However, there are many times when a PO line is closed before the item has left the department; consequently, running the polineremoveinterestedusers job means that interested users may be deleted before the item becomes available. Additionally, while the job removes the Interested Users from Alma, it does not remove the information from Analytics.
We request that:
A. Institutions have the ability to set a delay on the job based on the date the PO line was closed.…41 votes -
Allow more than 50 POLs on a PO via manual packaging
Right now, in the Purchase Order - Package screen, you can only package 50 POLs onto one PO. The "PO lines to package" screen will only display 50 POLs max, and if you select all, then go to the next screen, it removes everything from the first screen that you selected. This means only 50 POLs max can be put on a PO. This is frustrating when we put in an order for more than 50 items and have to create multiple POs for a single order. I think the easy fix would be to have those POLs remain checked…
39 votes -
Ability to raise a POL at 0.00 (zero) value
POL's are created for gifts, donations or items purchased via an eBook scheme to allow for analytics.
These POL's have to have a minimum value of 0.01, as a POL cannot be created at 0.00 (zero) value.
This creates an encumbrance against a fund, which is false and has an impact on the available balance38 votes -
Set continuing orders not to claim
There are some continuing orders for which we do not "receive" every item, such as newspapers that will be discarded after several weeks. It would be great if PO lines had an option to indicate that they should not be claimed. They end up cluttering up the Claims list and making the list harder to work with, when we are never going to claim or receive those issues. We also can't set up automatic claiming because we don't want emails sent for these titles.
37 votes -
Estimated price -field for following year on continuous POL
Estimated price -field is needed for databases and another continuous purchase orders for following year budget planning. There should be price fields for both current year and the following year (also possibility to split them to different funds). Estimated price -field should also to be selected on the analytics reports. Publishers may change database or journals prices a lot more than average rate.
36 votes -
ACQ: Improve PO Line Claiming job
Please make the PO Line Claiming job more granular. Sending claim letters to all vendors without restriction of any kind is not really feasible.
It should be possible to define own sets of PO lines (which should be claimed) by using the following criteria:
- One time orders
- Continuous orders: All / Serials / Standing orders
- Vendors: All / only specific vendors
- Acquistition types: All / only specific types (purchase, legal deposit, exchange, etc.)35 votes -
Keep POL reclaim interval and grace period when changing vendor
We have an issue with acquisition when it comes to continuous orders. If we change a vendor for a given POL, the data previously entered for the grace period and the reclaim interval disappears. They are replaced by the default value from the vendor.
This can be quite a serious issue when changing vendors for many POLs at once, which happens from time to time.
It would be much more efficient to keep the grace period and the reclaim interval for the POL, as it's linked to the serial publication interval.Grace period and claim interval depends on title periodicity.
The…
32 votes -
Unified PO Line Task List: Make the identifier field editable again
The identifier field in its new form allows for users to either select an existing value from a fold-down list or to enter a new value.
However, editing a value has become incredibly cumbersome. As the cursor cannot be placed in the current content of the field, users wanting to edit it have to copy the content to the clipboard, paste it in the field again and then perform the edit. From our point of view, this new feature is a regression.
It is not by choice that we often edit the identifier field, but because we see no alternative…30 votes -
Associating with more than one POL
Currently you can only associate a POL with one other POL. I would like the ability to associate a single POL with multiple POLs. This is helpful in associating different titles that are paid in a single package, or arrive together.
30 votes -
Automated order claiming
We need a solution for order claiming that works automatically for this for groups
- one time orders
- subscription orders
- standing orders
- online resource orders.Workflow:
a) The expected receipt date/expected activation date in the order/item/portfolio is reached.
b) Alma must send an claim to the vendor.
c) Alma changes the expected delivery date/expected activation date automatically by taking the information from the vendor-account (date of day plus expected receipt after ordering (days)/date of day+expected activation after ordering (days)).
d) A reminder in the task list is not necessary.Details for the four groups see attachment please.
28 votes -
Do not create activation task if portfolios are activated on import and do move POL into waiting for invoice status
When using GOBI API for e-book ordering and loading local stand alone MARC records, we don't want the activation task to be created because the portfolios are already activated on import, and the activation task is hampering the order from moving to Waiting for Invoice.
We want to be able to configure a Do not create electronic activation task setting in Update inventory import profile type
Yes27 votes -
More POL parameters/Mappaing fields to be needed in Import Profile (EOD)
We suggest that more parameters or mapping fields can be provided in creating the EOD profile. For example, we add on the profile, we want to set POL Status as EOD General parameter - Auto Packing, Manual Manual Packaging and In review.
26 votes
- Don't see your idea?