Patricia Farnan
My feedback
170 results found
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This would be very helpful in reducing clutter/confusion for staff.
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Good idea.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
We had a CERV request this year for the same thing: LENH-I-6033: Allow Library staff to merge duplicated Reading Lists. It didn't get through beyond the first round sadly, but we will re-submit it next year.
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Although we don't use the Q&A feature yet, someday if we get it to work we would like to see this option in place.
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
I like this idea.
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Good idea!
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Citation processing rules need improvement in general anyway - we submitted a CERV request regarding allowing more granularity with them. This is another way in which they could be improved. I have no votes but wanted to leave a comment.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This is a good idea - I would give it a vote if I had any spare ones!
-
24 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Great idea! I don't have any spare votes at the moment but will add some when I next do.
-
57 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
I don't have any votes but support this idea!
-
203 votes
Hi Elizabeth, Katie, and everyone,
Thanks so much for sharing this idea!
From what I understand, it includes two main parts:
- Allowing institutions to edit the list of values in various fields, with a specific example being the “Implemented Authorization Method” field.
- Adding more fields and making them reportable in Analytics, along with a request for a flexible mechanism to support this.
Regarding the second point — adding a flexible mechanism is quite a complex change and could impact the timeline.
If you can point out around three specific fields that are most important to add first, it might be easier.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks again,
Tamar
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
Ooh I had a spare vote, so I added it here.
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
13 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
If I had votes available I'd vote for this!
-
12 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
No votes sadly, but I support this idea.
-
11 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This would be very helpful for our workflow since when we order Course Reserves items, we want to put them in the temporary item location at the point of ordering - so if we could assign a physical item template at the point of ordering we wouldn't have to later go back into the item to add temp item info.
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
Add in function to exclude non -SBN content from ISBN matching in the Alma purchase request function
11 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Patricia Farnan
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
Patricia Farnan
commented
This would be a very helpful development, and we'd support it.
This would be a valuable improvement.