Nancy Babb
My feedback
47 results found
-
1 voteNancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
186 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
119 votes
Thank you for posting this idea. We are considering to have a new toggle
""group versions together" where users can choose to if to have search results grouped by versions or turn it off.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
I've been interested to find some examples of discovery tools that put FRBR options in the hands of the end user. For example, WorldCat Discovery has "Group this search" settings, with option to enable/disable "Group related editions" and "Group variant records." Here's an example and screenshot from my university: https://buffalo.on.worldcat.org/search?queryString=iliad%20lattimore&clusterResults=true&groupVariantRecords=false&changedFacet=scope&scope=sz%3A36346
It would be so exciting and helpful to our researchers if similar controls could be provided in Primo, for the FRBR settings!
In one of our Sandbox test views, I've added an External Search option to "Search without grouping," which sends the terms searched into a near-duplicate view with FRBR suppressed (https://suny-buf-psb.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?query=any,contains,hamlet%20olivier&tab=LibraryCatalog&search_scope=MyInstitution&vid=01SUNY_BUF:catalog&lang=en&offset=0) -- but this is not a good solution because it requires the campus to maintain a separate view. But if the FRBR settings could be easy user-controlled toggles (like "Expand My Results" and "Search in Full Text", this would be a great solution. -
122 votes
Dear all,
As part of the new UX of the All Titles search, it will be possible to view the bibliographic record in the details pane of the record (on the right side of the screen or in full view), and navigate between the records in the search using up/down arrow buttons as well as by selecting another record in the search list (on the left side or the screen).
An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
I believe that this was noted in NERS 2021 as planned for 2022 H1. Is there any update?
-
126 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
Here's the css that our webmaster (University at Buffalo Libraries) suggests adding to the css file:
To display the facet select boxes persistently:
.multiselect-facet-group.multiselect-inactive .md-chip md-checkbox {
transform: scaleX(1);
}To display the facet Exclude boxes persistently:
.section-content .md-chips .md-chip .md-chip-remove-container .md-button {
opacity: 1;
}You can see it at https://suny-buf-psb.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/search?vid=01SUNY_BUF:ExLib_Default_for_Test
-
85 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
It is so disappointing that the statement of responsibility is not displayed in Primo and that it seems impossible to add to the display in Primo VE without many negative impacts on citations, file export, sorting, etc.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
219 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
138 votes
This is planned to be developed only for Primo VE.
This will be part of the 2024 roadmap.
Nancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
134 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
A day and/or week embargo option would really help us and our users very much -- we have some newspapers with current issue only access, and it's impossible for us to indicate accurate coverage with current settings.
Nancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
-
96 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
All of the suggestions given here would be very useful and helpful to our researchers
-
22 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
62 votesNancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
130 votesNancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
199 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Nancy Babb
commented
I would like to support "drag and drop" and/or "add above/below" functionality for all possible settings in Alma. "Drag and drop" is in place for changing the order of the different categories of Resource Recommenders and is extremely helpful.
-
54 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesNancy Babb
shared this idea
·
-
42 votesNancy Babb
supported this idea
·
Re: FRBR Preferred allowing patrons to get to the title they are looking for with only a few clicks --
Just a quick caveat that this works if there is only a single title that matches the patron's search criteria, but any 2nd, 3rd, etc. matching work would still be lost in the FRBR group. And I worry in that case that the patron would mistakenly believe that only one match exists.