Stacey van Groll

My feedback

  1. 91 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    As mentioned by others, can Ex Libris please merge these two submissions into one, so that we can see a true picture of the desire for this functionality and don't split our votes?
    Right now there are 85 votes on one and 78 on another, putting this underlying idea at 163 votes. From a quick skim of the Top ideas, this would put it in the Top 30.
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/34532095-access-detailed-error-reports-for-all-jobs
    https://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/308173-alma/suggestions/15192714-improve-alma-job-reports-for-failed-record

    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  2. 103 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Alma » Acquisitions  ·  Admin →
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I believe that workaround has now been closed, as of the March 2019 release.

  3. 32 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Stacey van Groll shared this idea  · 
  4. 43 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Primo » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  5. 69 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  6. 40 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  7. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Primo » Primo VE  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Hi, I'm interested in this idea as sometimes the free services don't offer sufficient metadata for good Link Resolver matching. Could you clarify if you are talking about the display of services from Alma in the View It, as that doesn't correlate to the 'search algorithm' for ranking of PCI citations which matches first on the bibliographic record as the CTO and then displays the services? The display of services in Alma is within local control, such as by hiding free sources when subscription services are available by GES rules.

  8. 44 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    Stacey van Groll shared this idea  · 
  9. 115 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Agree with the crowd - both is preferable, not only so a user won't lose any records in either scenario, but also for UI consistency of one action of selecting (regardless of number) married to one action of warning, rather than one action of selecting with only sometimes a warning.

    Stacey van Groll supported this idea  · 
  10. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Stacey van Groll shared this idea  · 
  11. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I wonder if this is a local / environment bug? I have changed Analytics Object List scheduling many times and have had no loss of notifications in Manage Subscriptions.

  12. 75 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Noting that this is only an issue for Primo VE, whereas direct linking functions as expected for Primo Back Office sites to action an out link to a new browser tab from both Brief Results and the Full Record.
    It is also an issue (IMHO) for VE that activating direct linking does not add an out link symbol to the availability status in the UI, so that users can know the expected outcome of an action ie when clicking on a link with an out link symbol, a new browser tab will be opened and, when clicking on an availability status without an out link symbol, the full record overlay will display at the Get It or View It section.

  13. 271 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    The biggest use case for me for improving the pagination functionality is simply speeding up navigation through a list of results in the UI.
    As Blake has noted, we're currently limited to jumping 2 pages at a time in either direction at most.
    If you're reviewing a list sorted by Date-newest, and you want to skip through some content quickly, it would improve the user experience to offer the ability to click on the Page circle in the widget and, instead of the current X, have a text field where you can type a page number such as 10, to immediately go to Page 10.
    The X is irrelevant anyway given the display closes itself if you click anywhere else on the screen.
    At the moment, if you're on Page 1, you have 1st click on the circle, 2nd click on Page 5, 3rd click on the circle, 4th click on Page 7, 5th click on the circle, 6th click on Page 9, 7th click on the circle, and finally 8th click on Page 10.
    And, yes, you could also use the Date Range filter, but until you start doing a quick review of the results, you might not have a sense yet of what sort of date range you're looking at with the results of your search query. Our stats show that most users only use a couple of filters per session as well, and there should be other options (such as a good and useful pagination widget), over many facet selections.
    Improving the pagination widget to offer better page jumping functions would also help the performance of page loading in general. If users ignore the widget and click many times instead on Load More Results, by the time you get to page 10 or so, the speed of navigation and jerkiness of display starts to be obvious, because Primo is displaying so many results on screen at once and it simply can't handle it well.
    This is a prime benefit of using the pagination widget instead, as it loads the one page of content and starts the user off again at that point, which Primo clearly can handle better.
    I have noted that many of our staff don't even know that there is an option to click on the Page Number circle by the way, and are missing even the existing jumping options, so better indicative design there would be a good thing also.

  14. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    It looks like this might be on the 2019 Roadmap.

  15. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    This was fixed in the latest February 2019 release.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Hi Caroline,
    I have a Published case in for this one: 00418011
    It has been escalated to Development as an acknowledged defect.
    No fix date yet unfortunately though.
    Cheers, Stacey van Groll
    Discovery and Access Coordinator
    University of Queensland

  16. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I'm not sure if this is what you're thinking, but Admins can change Alma colouring from the out of the box blue to one of several different options.
    It does change it for the whole institution though, and some staff might object to some of the stronger colours such as red, as it's quite bold.
    https://knowledge.exlibrisgroup.com/Alma/Product_Documentation/010Alma_Online_Help_(English)/050Administration/050Configuring_General_Alma_Functions/060User_Interface_Settings#Configuring_the_Alma_Logos.2C_Color_Scheme.2C_and_Privacy_Policy

  17. 2 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Alma » Analytics  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Hi - would you be able to use Location Code in the Fulfillment SA for this? The OLH describes it as "Stores the code of the location of the physical item at the time of the loan."

  18. 31 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    Hi,
    Could you explain more, as when I do a Repository Search by Electronic Collection and then run the Export URLs job, I get a csv file with the Electronic Collections listed at the top with their 61 ID and URL and then - for instances where they have portfolios - the list of 53 IDs and URLs for the Portfolios.

  19. 10 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Content  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    You might have more luck with this one if you post it to the Content Idea Exchange.

  20. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stacey van Groll commented  · 

    I believe that this is because your local FRBR record display is set to Generic and there could be different content types in the group, such as a DVD or streamed version of a work. If you changed it to preferred FRBR record display, it should display the content type from that dynamically chosen preferred record.

Feedback and Knowledge Base