JMC
My feedback
29 results found
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedClearly, improved use of the information in ALL the 245 subfields is important to many of us. This is one of FOUR similar/related requests, with a total of 50 votes as of 8/16/2016:
• "The 245 field should display in repository search results, even if there is no 245$a" (10 votes)
• "Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available" (2 votes)
• "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" resource description when viewing/editing holdings and item record details" (13 votes)
• "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" criteria in Analytics &/or make them available as separate criteria" (25 votes) -
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedThanks, Carmel. Vote moved.
-
112 votesJMC supported this idea ·
-
8 votesJMC supported this idea ·
-
96 votesJMC supported this idea ·
-
38 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedYES!!!! It would also be helpful to be able to see exactly which records are locked so the cataloger can investigate further (for example, look at the history to see when last saved and note what, if any, changes have been made) before just releasing, or saving and releasing. This is particularly important when releasing records locked by other users. Thank you.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedGood grief! Make that second one "Improve the ease of reordering the Online Services Order and General Electronic Services Order tables" under Other
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commented... and "Improve sort order in configuration lists" under Other
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedPlease see also "Add ability to reorder Description Template Setup Rules using drag and drop" under Resource Management
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedSorry -- bad cut and paste -- please also see "Improve sort order in configuration lists" under Other :-)
An error occurred while saving the comment JMC commentedPlease see also "Add ability to reorder Description Template Setup Rules using drag and drop" under Resource Management and "Improve the ease of reordering the Online Services Order and General Electronic Services Order tables" under Other
Clearly, improved use of the information in ALL the 245 subfields is important to many of us. This is one of FOUR similar/related requests, with a total of 50 votes as of 8/16/2016:
• "The 245 field should display in repository search results, even if there is no 245$a" (10 votes)
• "Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available" (2 votes)
• "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" resource description when viewing/editing holdings and item record details" (13 votes)
• "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" criteria in Analytics &/or make them available as separate criteria" (25 votes)