Skip to content

JMC

My feedback

29 results found

  1. 12 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Clearly, improved use of the information in ALL the 245 subfields is important to many of us. This is one of FOUR similar/related requests, with a total of 50 votes as of 8/16/2016:
    • "The 245 field should display in repository search results, even if there is no 245$a" (10 votes)
    • "Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available" (2 votes)
    • "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" resource description when viewing/editing holdings and item record details" (13 votes)
    • "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" criteria in Analytics &/or make them available as separate criteria" (25 votes)

  2. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Clearly, improved use of the information in ALL the 245 subfields is important to many of us. This is one of FOUR similar/related requests, with a total of 50 votes as of 8/16/2016:
    • "The 245 field should display in repository search results, even if there is no 245$a" (10 votes)
    • "Please make the MARC bib. 245 subfield p from the bibliographic record available" (2 votes)
    • "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" resource description when viewing/editing holdings and item record details" (13 votes)
    • "Make 245 $p, $n, $s, $k, $f, $g part of "Title" criteria in Analytics &/or make them available as separate criteria" (25 votes)

  3. 19 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Thanks, Carmel. Vote moved.

  4. 112 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JMC supported this idea  · 
  5. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JMC supported this idea  · 
  6. 96 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    JMC supported this idea  · 
  7. 38 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    YES!!!! It would also be helpful to be able to see exactly which records are locked so the cataloger can investigate further (for example, look at the history to see when last saved and note what, if any, changes have been made) before just releasing, or saving and releasing. This is particularly important when releasing records locked by other users. Thank you.

  8. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Good grief! Make that second one "Improve the ease of reordering the Online Services Order and General Electronic Services Order tables" under Other

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    ... and "Improve sort order in configuration lists" under Other

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Please see also "Add ability to reorder Description Template Setup Rules using drag and drop" under Resource Management

  9. 31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Sorry -- bad cut and paste -- please also see "Improve sort order in configuration lists" under Other :-)

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    JMC commented  · 

    Please see also "Add ability to reorder Description Template Setup Rules using drag and drop" under Resource Management and "Improve the ease of reordering the Online Services Order and General Electronic Services Order tables" under Other

2 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base