François Renaville

My feedback

  1. 56 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Fulfillment  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  2. 122 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Primo » Other  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Sure! Let's be ambitious! ;-)

    François Renaville commented  · 

    Very nice! However, not all PCI articles are real articles: many other resource types are identified as articles (most probably already in the provided sources). Therefore, excluding records based only on the resource type can also remove ‘useful’/’meaningful’ records from discovery. I would prefer a solution in Primo BO:

    (1) that combines indexes, search options, operators and search terms:

    - Exclude records where TITLE contains phrase “table of contents” AND where COLLECTION is “proquest”
    --> To avoid this: https://www.screencast.com/t/6e0DPbyRu

    - Exclude records where TITLE is exactly “JAMA” AND where COLLECTION is (“crossref” OR “jama”) AND where resource type is “article”
    -->To avoid this https://www.screencast.com/t/nsLRvnYH

    - Exclude records where TITLE is exactly “Index Volume” AND where COLLECTION “sciversesciencedirect_elsevier” AND where resource type is “article”
    --> To avoid this https://www.screencast.com/t/rIr3QAZIp

    (2) and that allows to remove/suppress PCI records based on the PCI IDs (= list of excluded records)

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  3. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  4. 145 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  Dana Sharvit responded

    After reviewing this idea, we decided to update our plans to include this suggested change.
    We will be contacting the provider.
    Thank you for your contribution

    François Renaville shared this idea  · 
  5. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  6. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  7. 8 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Hi Sean,
    There is a similar issue between Alma and the Primo MyAccount. KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm and University of Liège consider this rather as a "bug" for which no enhancement should be asked: interoperability between Alma and Primo should indeed be maximal by default (see our cases #00438186 and #00450129).
    Regards,
    François

  8. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Hi Chris -

    I can see in the PCI widget that oaFindr requires subscription Search and Delivery. So, I don't see how it could be marked as an Open Access collection.
    I wonder if a SF case would not be better to fix the issue you describe.

    François

  9. 14 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Also ideally: this excellent suggestion should be applied to Primo BO in a near future release, without necessarily going through the Idea Exchange process. I see this a basic UX expectation and requirement from Primo administrators...

    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  10. 67 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  11. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  12. 93 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  13. 25 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  14. 28 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  15. 54 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  16. 27 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Hi Jason,
    I wonder if your idea wouldn't be better in the Content forum http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/574345-content dedicated to extend and improve the discovery indexes, KnowledgeBases and Community Zone.

  18. 9 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville commented  · 

    Hi Keio University,

    I think you should rather support the following idea on the Content forum http://ideas.exlibrisgroup.com/forums/574345-content/suggestions/18889297-add-elsevier-clinicalkey-journals-and-elsevier-cli

    Regards,

    François

  19. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Alma » Other  ·  Admin →
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 
  20. 61 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    François Renaville supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base