Enrich metadata for Cambridge eBooks without Partner Presses: 2025 All eBooks
We have noticed that many books in the Cambridge eBooks without Partner Presses: 2025 All eBooks collection have very poor metadata. Here are a few examples from our library:
https://librarysearch.library.utoronto.ca/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107601734406196,
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107591035006196
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107607460306196
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107607460806196
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107579864506196
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107582319506196
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107610864306196
https://utoronto.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01UTORONTO_INST/k9bh95/alma991107582322006196
These examples are just from the first two pages (of 63) search results, so I suspect there are many more like this. Could Ex Libris ask the vendor to supply fuller records for these books? Thank you!
Hello,
Cambridge UP provides us with enrichment files on a monthly basis. These records may be newer additions and therefore might not have been enriched by the current feed yet.
Overall, the average Bib ranking for this collection is 87.35, which is considered good. Since most records in this collection are of high quality and these cases appear to be exceptions, I believe this issue should be reported via a support ticket, as it seems to be a specific error rather than an indication that a new enrichment feed is needed.
I kindly ask you to open a support ticket and appreciate your continued efforts in maintaining the high quality of the CZ.
Please share the case number with me so I can follow up on the analysis of these titles.
Kind regards,
Tamar Ganor
Content Product Manager