Adding material visibility start and end dates for uploaded files requires clicking in and out of every citation on the list which has an uploaded file, and then clicking 4 or 5 times further to advance the calendar to the end of the semester for each citation's material visibility end date. This request is asking for the rollover process, both for instructor and course loader rollover, to include the option to assign new material visibility start and end dates to any citations on the list which have a material visibility date at the time of rollover, and the new course start date and course end date should populate the rollover fields as the default values. This would save a lot of time on the rollover process for long lists which have a lot of citations with uploaded files.

When you create a new list using a blank template and want to add some sections you are able to add the first section however when you want to add a second section a pop-up appears which tells you to add items to the first section and this pops up in front of the add section button, also there doesn't seem to be a way of closing the pop up unless you click to add an item.

It would be good if there was an 'X' in the pop up so we can continue to add sections or an option to configure in Alma that this pop up doesn't show any more.

Currently the reading list jobs in Alma/Leganto rely on users creating a set of reading lists. Unfortunately the creation of the set is based only on the reading list code, which:

• makes it inconsistent with all other set creation activities which support IDs


• adds unnecessary complication when loading the file of data to create the set, in that you then have to worry about handling special characters and unique codes.

It would basically be the same as requiring users to upload a set of titles to create a title/physical item set.

We've had to create several reading list sets in the last few months, and each time several lists have failed to load in the set because of uniqueness or special character (including commas).

We have had an interesting suggestion from Library staff working with Departments on topical reading lists - they would like to be able to 'pin' such lists to the Find lists page to make them 'featured' in a similar way to which the default "Recommended" - Popular/New/Recently Updated' ones appear. Ideally a pinned list/s would be more prominent to users throughout the interface, but the Find lists as a landing page would make sense to promote a themed list for library services - being able to scheduled the pin would be even better, but the core concept of pinning something the library wished to promote is something we would like to see available.

In our environment, we prefer only one Reading List to be associated with a single Course Code. However, sometimes Instructors link multiple Reading Lists to the same course. This is often in error.

It would be good to have a warning in Leganto that warns instructors that they are linking a Reading List to a Course code that already has a Reading List attached to it.

This should be able to be "overridden" to allow for instances where it is in fact desirable. And should be configurable for institutions for whom this is not desirable to be seen by instructors.

Note: This is the opposite to allowing multiple courses to be associated with a single Reading List which we do allow for.

When resource locate is run on a single citation, Alma will only locate it if a single match is found; if there are no matches or multiple matches then the resource locate will fail and the citation's status will change to declined.

The resource locate multiple match priority settings, which we use to prioritise electronic inventory, currently only apply when running resource locate in bulk using the Process and Enrich citations in Bulk job or when citations are added in Leganto by instructors. It does not apply when running resource locate on a single citation in Alma i.e. as happens when clicking save and run.

It would be useful if these settings could be utilised when running resource locate on a single citation, and would streamline the process of staff having to run resource locate and manually select the desired resource, particularly if the only matches are print and electronic records of the same title. This would mimic the automated workflow used elsewhere.

If a citation (added either via the Primo search in Leganto, or via CiteIt) has an online link, then this is displayed for students (even if the item is still BeingPrepared instead of Complete).

But if the instructor then also uploads a file to the item and copyright approval is needed then
a) the file is unavailable to students until it's approved - this is good! and
b) the online link is now also unavailable to students until the file is approved

We'd like the online link to remain available regardless of whether or not a file is waiting for copyright approval. I can't think of any use case where the online link itself is subject to copyright clearance. Eg

• A link to an Amazon book page, or an article pre-print, and the lecturer uploads a chapter or the final version of the article which requires copyright clearance. But the link is to a publicly accessible webpage and would be especially useful for students to access while waiting for the library to clear the copyright.




• A link to an article we have subscription access to, but the lecturer mistakenly uploads a file as well. Students should have access to the link until the library can decline/remove the file as unnecessary.

If other libraries can think of use cases where access to the link should be subject to copyright clearance then perhaps this behaviour could be configurable.